User talk:Lukedavey

It is ridiculous that you keep removing my very small paragragh on The Subways page. The paragraph was there for more than a week, explaining why not everybody approves of the band (which is completely true and evident on any website you look on that has reviews by users of the site, particularly Amazon.co.uk), and then suddenly it was removed and I find it impossible to replace it for more than a few minutes. This is preposterous. I don't understand how you can call this an encyclopedia for the people, and then refuse to allow TRUE POINTS to be placed on the page, and allow it to look biased towards one particular opinion. That is dictatorship, and it's wrong. Please will you just put the damn paragraph back on the Subways page permanently, because it deserves to be on there as much as, if not more than, a lot of the populist rubbish that has been placed on there. Thank you.

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. The notices and comments are needed to establish community consensus about the status of an article, and removing them is considered vandalism. If you oppose the deletion of an article, you may comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- blue 520  08:42, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:PETRKORDA.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:PETRKORDA.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 10:07, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:CORIAGAUDIOVILAS.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CORIAGAUDIOVILAS.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 16:05, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Your extreme vandalism of Serena Williams
This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism has shown you to be intent on doing harm to Wikipedia. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Stanley011 20:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Good job on the Ljubicic headshot
If it was you who put it up. :) BKmetic 02:27, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Actually I completely take it back now that I see what an awful thing you did on the Serena Williams page? What came into your head??? BKmetic 02:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:GASTONGAUDIO.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:GASTONGAUDIO.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Liftarn 12:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. -- Al e  x  (talk here) 20:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

No personal attacks
Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Please also look at this discussion. J Ditalk 20:38, 8 September 2006 (UTC)