User talk:Lukenmatt1234

License tagging for Image:Bourne brook South Caldicot.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Bourne brook South Caldicot.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:05, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please do not vandalise pages e.g. see your handiwork on Genetically modified food, instead contribute positively - see below:

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

More Vandalism and non-notable bio
Also I have noted you have vandalised these pages - they have been corrected : The Leys School Common Agricultural Policy, and your non-notable biography is likely to be deleted. Please try and add to Wikipedia constructively.

Thanks Lethaniol 15:55, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Michael Punt
Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 12:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing  because of . Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. NawlinWiki 12:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of David vanneck
A tag has been placed on David vanneck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Spick And Span  [Talk][Contributions] 12:07, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of David Vanneck
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as David Vanneck, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CastAStone//(talk) 20:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. IrishGuy talk 21:30, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Last chance
You have been blocked for 31 hours. From your edits and the deleted pages you have made (not visible to you, since they're deleted, but you know what you've written), this appears to be a vandalism-only account. So, just a friendly note that you will be watched very closely and if you continue vandalising you are likely to be blocked indefinitely. —Random832 21:38, 8 January 2008 (UTC)