User talk:Lukobe/Archive Oct 2007

FAR notice
Seattle, Washington has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.  Lara Love  17:28, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Northwestschool.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Northwestschool.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. • Lawrence Cohen  16:22, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Cranium, Inc.
I've added a few external refs. This is obviously a notable company, winning three major industry awards, numerous write-ups in industry journals, etc. Hope you don't mind. Yngvarr (t) (c) 23:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Seattle
Any chance you could help out with some of the issues in the Seattle, Washington article? It is undergoing featured article review and it does, indeed, have a lot of problems that have crept in. - Jmabel | Talk 17:55, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The main things I see are that (despite the many citations) much is still uncited; that a few of the citations are still on GoDot's idiosyncratic style; and, more generally, that there is a lot of rather clumsy writing. I'm working on these, slowly, as is Bobblehead, but it's probably going to require more than the two of us can give it. You might also look at issues raised on the talk page or in the FARC request. But if you are back to work, don't sweat it; I was thinking you might be more available. - Jmabel | Talk 18:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)