User talk:Luksius11

February 2023
Hello Luksius11. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Luksius11. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 17:17, 14 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello @331dot, I am preparing and updating a lot of Fintech informations which are going though money raising rounds. This is the first company I have started.
 * It is hard to understand why this is being not accepted if article is true and all information is up to date and accurate.
 * I am looking in similar structure as this Fintech company has: Mambu (company)
 * Can you please prove exact steps what I need to complete to get this live? Or this would be the same issue with all new articles?
 * Do I need resubmit this article though here: Articles for creation
 * Looking forward to hearing from you,
 * Lukas 78.62.206.126 (talk) 12:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are this user, remember to log in before posting. Please read other stuff exists; it is not always a good idea to use other similar articles as a model or guide, as these too could be problematic and you wouldn't be aware of this. Not everything has been checked to ensure compliance with guidelines. The article you link to has several issues. If you want to use other articles as a model, use those classified as good articles, which have been checked by the community. I will have more to say later; do you work for the company, or in the field, such as for a competitor? 331dot (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell of the existence of a company, what it does, and its routine activities(like funding rounds). A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. "Significant coverage" goes beyond merely telling about the company and goes into detail about what is significant or influential about the company as the source sees it, not as the company itself might see it. Sources like brief mentions, announcements of routine activities, staff interviews, and the like do not establish notability. Please read Your First Article. 331dot (talk) 14:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * The sources you have in your draft are all inappropriate for establishing notability. If that is all you have, the company does not merit an article at this time. 331dot (talk) 14:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey, @331dot what do you mean that all sources are inappropriate? If you check this company it contains the same type of links to their site and to different publishing sites.: Mambu (company)
 * Sorry for not logging in for previous comment but yes I can confirm the same here:
 * I am preparing and updating a lot of Fintech informations which are going though money raising rounds. This is the first company I have started.
 * It is hard to understand why this is being not accepted if article is true and all information is up to date and accurate.
 * I am looking in similar structure as this Fintech company has: Mambu (company)
 * Can you please prove exact steps what I need to complete to get this live? Or this would be the same issue with all new articles? Can you point exact what is the problem? Because all information is correct and nothing is misleading. Even why these type of links are inappropriate?
 * Luksius11 (talk) 06:28, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't doubt that the information is correct. That's not the issue.  Wikipedia is not for merely providing information, and (as I said above) is not a place to merely tell of the activities of a company. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. "Significant coverage" goes beyond merely telling about the company and goes into detail about what is significant or influential about the company as the source sees it, not as the company itself might see it. Sources like brief mentions, announcements of routine activities, staff interviews, and the like do not establish notability.  Your sources are the following:
 * the company website, which is not an independent source
 * an interview with the CEO of the company, which is not an independent source
 * a simple page that serves simply to document the co founder of the company, not significant coverage
 * an announcement of the company raising funds, not significant coverage
 * a press release from the company about its activities, not an independent source
 * a similar press release about the same activities, just republished
 * None of these establish notability. The raising of funds is a routine business activity- all businesses do that- and is not significant by itself. There must be sources with significant coverage of the company and why it is important/significant/influential. Ford Motor Company merits an article not because it sells a lot of cars, but because of its influence in the car industry and manufacturing more broadly(i.e. by pioneering assembly lines).  Do independent sources say that Integrated Finance is particularly influential in its field?  Does it have a unique business strategy that others try to emulate or is particularly successful for them? It doesn't have to be good things the company did either(see Trump University or Trump Steaks).  Just summarizing funding rounds is not sufficient for an article and will not be accepted.  If this is all the sources you have, the company does not merit an article. The vast majority of companies do not merit articles. 331dot (talk) 07:50, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Please see my message above about the danger of using other similar articles as a model for yours.
 * And as I warned you against above, the Mambu article has similar problems as your draft, and is a poor model to use- I've marked it as problematic. 331dot (talk) 07:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * hello @331dot can you please share more info? Luksius11 (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * What more info do you want? 331dot (talk) 18:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Nottingham College
Hi, reverted, use British English in British article. Regards  palmiped Talk  17:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Integrated Finance (February 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Integrated Finance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Integrated_Finance Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Integrated_Finance reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Integrated Finance (April 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Integrated Finance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Integrated_Finance Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greenman&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Integrated_Finance reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Integrated Finance
Hello, Luksius11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Integrated Finance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 1 September 2023 (UTC)