User talk:Luliche

Politecnico di Milano
Hi, I checked carefully but had to remove again your edits to the Politecnico di Milano page. You should take care not to generalize your own experiences. Wikipedia is not a bullettin board, it is all about verifiable facts with solid sources. For instance, where do the figures you quote come from? I was unable to find them, but if you have a source quote it, by all means! Please, do not just re-add your paragraphs, as I will re-remove them, and we will both lose time and conflict with WP rules. Thanks for your understanding and patience. --Raistlin (talk) 21:07, 6 September 2009 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Politecnico di Milano appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. --Raistlin (talk) 18:09, 10 September 2009 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted.  If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again.  If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.  --Raistlin (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)


 * [[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Raistlin (talk) 20:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)


 * Nuvola apps important.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --Raistlin (talk) 20:17, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for one week to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below.