User talk:Lully Lover

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring and sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Rare Disease UK
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Rare Disease UK, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.raredisease.org.uk.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:GeneticAllianceUK logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:GeneticAllianceUK logo.JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Media copyright questions.

Editing of Mace (store) page. Please note all edits should be referenced to reliable external sources. Wikipedia is not an advertising forum for any company, it is a repository of information and knowledge. Please do not delete referenced relevant information from pages.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Rare Disease UK
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Rare Disease UK, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.raredisease.org.uk/ and http://www.rarediseaseday.org/article/about-rare-disease-day and http://www.eurordis.org/content/what-rare-disease and http://www.alpha1awareness.org.uk/news.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Rare Disease UK and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Rare Disease UK, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Rare Disease UK with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Rare Disease UK. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Rare Disease UK saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 15:13, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rare Disease UK


A tag has been placed on Rare Disease UK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Rare Disease UK and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Syrthiss (talk) 15:52, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

status
I see little distinctive usable content--the page is 90% general information about rare diseases in the UK, not about the organization. , and, since it is only a program or sub-organization of Genetic Alliance,  and does not seem to be except technically a separate organization-- judging by both the article and its own  web site, I am redirecting it to that article. It will be better to have one good article than two weak ones.  DGG ( talk ) 00:14, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Genetic Alliance UK


A tag has been placed on Genetic Alliance UK, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Genetic Alliance UK and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Syrthiss (talk) 15:54, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Advice
Hi, as you have disclosed that this account is operated by a PR company, please be sure to read WP:PROMO and WP:COI as well as WP:ORG to ensure that you understand what you can and can't do on wikipedia in terms of promoting your clients. Thanks SmartSE (talk) 17:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Urgent advice
The above comment is perfectly correct but ,as reviewing administrator for these articles, I think I need to give you some help in dealing with this. You will understand that as a very prominent web site, it is necessary for us to be very formal about copyright: we must set an example of unquestionably good practice. Therefore, for you permission to be effective, you must actually send the notice to OTRS and say so on the article talk page according to our standard procedure for it to have effect.

But we are also an encyclopedia, and an encyclopedia is different from a public relations site: we provide information about organisations of importance, but we do not act specifically to publicize them. The style of a web site is almost never  suitable for an encyclopedia, as it is written to attract support, and giving ways for people to show the support. These articles in considerable part share this problem, so they would need to be considerably rewritten, especially to remove duplication, and also remove general statements about why the concerns of the groups are important.

Though your activities are very deserving of promotion, nonetheless this is not an appropriate purpose for an encyclopedia. You said on one of the talk pagea:
 * I am writing from Velvet PR. We are the press office for Rare Disease UK and, as such, manage all traditional print press, digital and broadcast media output. We have copywrite permission from RDUK, and its parent charity, The Genetic Alliance. They can be contacted on: Julian Walker Marketing and Communications Officer Genetic Alliance UK Unit 4D, Leroy House 436 Essex Road London N1 3QP www.geneticalliance.org.uk T: +44 (0)20 7704 3141 F: +44 (0)20 7359 144. Can we please resolve this as quickly as possible. Our concern is that we have an accurate Wiki page for RDUK ready for Rare Disease Day on Monday 28 February on 2011. Best wishes,Sophie Clifton Velvet PR, sophie@velvetpr.biz

Frankly, this highlights the promotional nature of the material. .

What we can do is help you get a suitable encyclopedic page. I frequently work with this sort of material here, and I'd be glad to do so. But if you'll think about it, a suitable page will be best written by someone without Conflict of Interest; it's not impossible to do it properly with a conflict of interest or as a paid press agent, but it's relatively more difficult: you are automatically thinking in terms of the organization wishes to communicate to the public, but an uninvolved person will think in terms of what the public might wish to know.

Given my concern for assisting you,, and considering the difference in time zones along with the time pressure, what I will do is personally rewrite the articles briefly myself as an ordinary editor here. If you wish to add any further information do so, but do not add minor material about staff or information about specific events: that belongs on your own web site. What is also needed is references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. Newspapers are ideal. And as for the illustration, there we need the formal license. Remember to do it or they will be deleted. DGG ( talk ) 18:28, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 * I notice you have restored text that I removed,  another editor quite properly removed it again. Please do not try this again. That's the sort of thing which can easily lead to such a strong feeling that the article cannot be rewritten in a neutral fashion, that it must be deleted.   It can also lead to your being blocked from editing as a purely promotional account. I have the ability to do both, and, although I do not block people often, I do when I need to.    DGG ( talk ) 03:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Genetic Alliance UK
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Genetic Alliance UK, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.geneticalliance.org.uk/history.htm and http://www.raredisease.org.uk/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Genetic Alliance UK and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Genetic Alliance UK, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Genetic Alliance UK with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Genetic Alliance UK. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Genetic Alliance UK saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 13:00, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RDUKlogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:RDUKlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Mace (store) edit
I have noticed you have again edited the page Mace (store). In editing the page again you have removed relevant references, and written the page like an advert. I have read above you work for a PR agency and it has been previously explained to you that Wikipedia is a knowledge resource, not an advertising medium. I also see you have previously reverted edits on other pages, if you make biased/unreferenced edits they will be removed. If you wish to edit please do so, from an unbiased point of view and using reliable independent references. If there is already accurate referenced information there it should not be removed, but added to. --Cfs198 (talk) 21:31, 2 March 2011 (UTC)CFS198

Orphaned non-free image File:GeneticAllianceUK logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:GeneticAllianceUK logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)