User talk:Lumal

December 2008 please remove all UPloads and all usage herein
blocking has included removing ability to change permissions on previous uploads, so please remove all permissions and all contributions system wide per LUMAL account. Can not even request action by blocker by means of messaging within system. No recourse is convenient censorship

public use of File:IBatMontyPearlmansStudioHollywood.jpg denied by me as author & photographer

April 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Lumal, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. -- lucasbfr talk 13:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove speedy deletion notices. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion.  DarkSaber2k 13:57, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:IBat90&2minutes.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:IBat90&2minutes.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:IBat90&2minutesNEW.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:IBat90&2minutes.jpg. The copy called Image:IBat90&2minutes.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 07:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Carney's on sunset
A tag has been placed on Carney's on sunset requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 08:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Carney's on sunset
I have nominated Carney's on sunset, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Carney's on sunset. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Toddst1 (talk) 09:52, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Image deletion
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:JohnGBarrettKCTM.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-3.0 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Media copyright questions. Thank you.

License tagging for Image:Marty-Mcsorley-on-catalina-trip-BodyGloveBob.com-boat .jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Marty-Mcsorley-on-catalina-trip-BodyGloveBob.com-boat .jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lionheart/Wrong Bet/A.W.O.L. - Absent Without Leave (film)
A tag has been placed on Lionheart/Wrong Bet/A.W.O.L. - Absent Without Leave (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. //  Chris  (complaints) • (contribs) 02:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Lionheart/Wrong Bet/A.W.O.L. - Absent Without Leave (film)
A tag has been placed on Lionheart/Wrong Bet/A.W.O.L. - Absent Without Leave (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Basketball 110   the pages I've messed up completely  02:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:H-duty5.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:H-duty5.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:17, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I have deleted this image as an advertisement. If you have the original image as you say, please upload it without the watermarks. -Thanks Nv8200p talk 13:16, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:CarneyGIANTkid-web.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:CarneyGIANTkid-web.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 21:16, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. SWik78 (talk) 15:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

people who express support who actually know him John G. Barrett unconstructive edits how interesting Lumal (talk) 10:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Dive N' Surf
A tag has been placed on Dive N' Surf, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Booglamay (talk) 10:36, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Image Rights for Image:DorianYates-RayMentzer.jpg; image:KirkMaillet&MikeMentzer2.jpg and Image:Dorian-yates.jpg
We have recieved an e-mail via OTRS about the copyright status of these images. The image tags indicate that you are the rights holder and that you took the images personally. To assist me with dealing with the enquiry, please can you confirm that this is correct and that you do definitely hold the rights to these images? I am sorry if this sounds a bit terse but I'm not allowed to publish the contents of any e-mails sent via OTRS so I'm kind of faced with having to simply ask the question. Thanks Spartaz Humbug! 21:12, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:BEST-Girls.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BEST-Girls.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 12:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:3rdBLACK.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:3rdBLACK.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 22:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Copyright Violation on Jim Jones the Peoples Temple use of Liberation theology
Hi, Lumal. The text in this edit was a direct copy of this book review and therefore, violates wikipedia's copyright policy. In addition, a book review on a book about Jones is irrelevant in an article about Jones. The actual facts about Jones himself (not the book reviewers take on a book) are what would be relevant. Finally, it was largely repetitive of the rest of the article. Mosedschurte (talk) 20:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:MARTYmC.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:MARTYmC.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Polanski-postersmall.jpg}
Thank you for uploading Image:Polanski-postersmall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Posters
I'm no expert, but here's my understanding. Posters are always copyright, and can only be justified under "fair use" criteria. Look at sections 2,3 and 4 of Image:Titanic poster.jpg (section 1 is just a verification by another editor added later) as an example Hope this helps, jimfbleak (talk) 05:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The summary must say what it is, who owns the copyright ("likely owned by the production company" if not sure) and where you got the image from
 * For each article it's used in, you must justify its use - Titanic shows how to do this
 * Unusually, the Titanic poster is used in two articles, so a second separate justification must be given for each article
 * Then you need the "fair use" licence
 * and category

Image source problem with Image:BILLmesitrell.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:BILLmesitrell.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:17, 26 November 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 05:17, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

== Blocked REPLY by Kirk Maillet == NAZI's Obama type manipulation BLOCKED cause my website name is same as userNAME. Hitler would be proud of this elitist crap. TECH police, free speech be damned. Google and the gang of 20 some tech pirates controlling these internet resources, which are OWNED

== Blocked == This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Business' FAQ and Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text  or emailing the administrator who blocked you. Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here.


 * Conflict of interest/Noticeboard
 * (User:Lumal block log) — Athaenara  ✉  02:14, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:LumalWWII.gif
A tag has been placed on Image:LumalWWII.gif, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:56, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:CrandallBROOKSvera2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CrandallBROOKSvera2.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

Images and articles for discussion
→ see also: 

Images for discussion
Images uploaded via the Lumal account:
 * November 2008:


 * July 2008:


 * June 2008:


 * March 2008:


 * February 2008:


 * December 2007:

(Added image links above to aid deletion sorting.) — Athaenara ✉  07:09, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Articles for discussion
Articles written / edited via the Lumal account (incomplete list):
 * December 2007 - November 2008:

(Added article links above to aid cleanup or deletion sorting.) — Athaenara  ✉  08:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: links above do not include deleted contributions. — Athaenara ✉  08:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:HeinrichAhasverusGrafvonLehndorff-Steinort.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:HeinrichAhasverusGrafvonLehndorff-Steinort.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:42, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Palladio-1dup.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Palladio-1dup.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Img 3201-KMplus2.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Img 3201-KMplus2.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:BarrettADJUSTSmosher.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:BarrettADJUSTSmosher.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:49, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:DIVEnSURFlogo.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:DIVEnSURFlogo.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:50, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:GregBUCKMANandKIRK.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:GregBUCKMANandKIRK.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:FrankDux.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:FrankDux.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:OnSETlionheart.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OnSETlionheart.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:53, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:DorianYates-RayMentzer.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:DorianYates-RayMentzer.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:KirkMaillet&MikeMentzer2.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:KirkMaillet&MikeMentzer2.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Bhh-1912a-km7.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Bhh-1912a-km7.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:56, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:RonLARRYweintrab.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RonLARRYweintrab.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:JBheadSHOTImg 4723-km.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:JBheadSHOTImg 4723-km.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 15:59, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image permission problem with Image:Carneys-servicestation-km7.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Carneys-servicestation-km7.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:02, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Signcarney3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Signcarney3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:BIGdonutLAXbyKEM.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:BIGdonutLAXbyKEM.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:04, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:400px-ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg
File:400px-ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:400px-ChuckNorrisSTUDIOrules.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:28, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:IbMelchior&CleoBaldon.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:IbMelchior&CleoBaldon.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  02:31, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

File:CadetsEUGENEmaillet.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:CadetsEUGENEmaillet.jpg

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 05:05, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:ChucknorrisWALKofFAME.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ChucknorrisWALKofFAME.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Niteshift36 (talk) 16:19, 20 May 2013 (UTC)