User talk:Lumia930uploader

Adding inappropriate templates
Hi, I noticed that you added a primary sources template to a stub article already listed in the correct stub category (that is, the Bilyi Kamin stub). Please read WP:STUB for further information.

When you use clean-up templates, be sure you read the information on where and how to use them with care. In fact, the stub has no sources at this point, but is part of a larger geographical project. If any templates are in order, the Template:Expand language would fit the bill. In this instance, the stub can be expanded from the Ukrainian Wikipedia article. I'm about to add that template, so you can take a look and see how it's done.

Thanks for your attention, and happy editing! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 01:42, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Cooperation on MSN article
Just wanted to reach out and say thanks for being cooperative with my WP:BOLD changes to the MSN article and understanding that my efforts at organizing and rewriting content are in WP:GOODFAITH. Hopefully we can arrive at a set of text to include that satisfies everyone. --Samvscat (talk) 19:09, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

I have been editing the MSN article off-and-on for several years; it's probably my biggest contribution to Wikipedia; I wrote almost all of the content for MSN Dial-up. I know we are all very passionate about these topics that interest us a lot. --Samvscat (talk) 19:11, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bing Mobile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shazam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:Microsoft Windows family
Hello.

I think it is time (and actually late) to have a chat about your changes in Template:Microsoft Windows family.

First, a note about our editing policy: allows one reviewer (in this case, I) to review the contributions of one editor (in this case, you) and if found them objectionable, revert them. In case the original contributor is unsatisfied with the reversion, the two editors should take the matter to a talk page (Template talk:Microsoft Windows family in this case) and discuss. Repeatedly restoring your contribution through counter-reverting and refraining from a discussion is called edit warring and may lead to the loss of your editing privileges.

Your overall method of contribution shows that you have not completely divined the purpose of our classification in the disputed navbox. Please take a moment to study it. If you still did not understand your error, I will be more than glad to answer your questions.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 21:22, 12 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Pretty please, with some sugar on the top, take your questions to talk page. Because the next time you make a non-collaborative revert, I will report you. Fleet Command (talk) 11:15, 13 April 2015 (UTC)


 * And FYI, you have made three reverts within 24 hours. (See WP:3RR) If you make one more revert, you might be blocked from editing. Fleet Command (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Fleet Command (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Lumia930uploader, if you reply at the noticeboard and agree to wait for consensus, this complaint against you might be closed with no block. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:50, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The report has been closed with a warning to you for edit warring at Template:Microsoft Windows family. You may be blocked if you continue to revert without getting consensus on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 00:22, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

Please re organize Template: Nokia
Hey Lumia,

I saw your excellent work on Template: Nokia Services. You have an excellent knowledge on the subject The work was really really perfect and will give you thumbs up for that.

Actually i have one more similar task for you.

Please re organize Template: Nokia

Reason: It seems it is missing many entries esp former, spin-off, sold companies etc. Also places which nokia owns or owned etc.

Below links may help you

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nokia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nokia_assets

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acquisitions_by_Nokia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nokia_people

Thanks in Advance...... 49.200.95.77 (talk) 11:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Quickie
FYI, there really isn't any need to put Microsoft in brackets as the manufacturer of the Lumia 930 as it is obvious from the name that Microsoft Mobile is a division of Microsoft. If you have any concerns please don't hesitate to contact me. &#60;&#60;&#60; SOME GADGET GEEK &#62;&#62;&#62; (talk) 02:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Microsoft JobLenses.png
Thank you for uploading File:Microsoft JobLenses.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:
 * File:Microsoft Motion Data.png

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)