User talk:Lumoshi/Archive 1

Speedy deletion nomination of Turtle Canyon


A tag has been placed on Turtle Canyon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Tchaliburton (talk) 17:04, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

stop it you and your goddamn stupid joke already it is not funny and there is no reason for that page exist aside to be wacky. you guys are horrible. what you are going to do, ban me for forever just because your silly joke? sure go ahead. ~locky — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.71.141.130 (talk) 18:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

because the purpose of the article is about the joke that you guys have done and adding irrelevant links and categories (Attractions where you can see and feel the excitement? really?) that what makes me mad about it because you guys are taking this joke way too damn far. ~locky — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.71.141.130 (talk) 18:58, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

k sure go ahead you guys are always like that. "if you don't like what i like, then you will be banned!11!!!!!111!!" ~ locky — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.71.141.130 (talk) 19:09, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

and i removed all the unnecessary parts. good job, us! ~locky — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.71.141.130 (talk) 19:11, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

idk if you noticed but i didn't put any deletion tag in the page since the last time i did. also good job doing what you guys always do, ban anyone that doesnt likes your stupid joke. ~locky — Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.71.141.130 (talk) 19:17, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

You're about to be blocked for edit warring
Your recent editing history at Turtle Canyon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Electric Wombat (talk) 20:15, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Turtle Canyon. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --j⚛e deckertalk 04:34, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * PS: I caught your comments on Electric Wombat's talk page. I do think other folks have contributed to the page at this point, so I can't get it deleted under that criterion, moreover, I can find at least one more news article on the subject, it's not impossible an okay article could eventually arise from it.   The main thing to remember is WP:3RR, which is a pretty hard-line rule, and generally ends up with a block for the person who does it.  If you see someone else doing it, there are links to a noticeboard you can use to report it.
 * Anyway, if you really want to try and get it deleted, you're welcome to put a WP:PROD on it and I won't fight it, but I couldn't delete it under db-author, and I figured I should let you know that. Have a great week, --j⚛e deckertalk 05:05, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:HarambePortrait2016.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:HarambePortrait2016.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the Non-free fair use tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Celia Homeford (talk) 11:15, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:58, 10 November 2016 (UTC)