User talk:LunaNoir91/sandbox

I noticed you changed a good amount of work! I already see a big difference between the original and your work. I see that you got rid of the basic summary and organized the information into the subtitles of History and Description. I think it is important that the readers get a good idea of what the statue is and what its history is before getting right into how it was found as the previous author did. So far I think that it is organized very well. As far as structure, I see that there are still some empty spots where you might have ideas for other subtitles. Good to see that you're on the hunt for more information! That's one thing I’ve been having trouble with on my piece because not much is known about it. The main thing that I notice is that you've added so many more sections to your article and I think you're really doing great work so far. By “neutral content” I think she means that the information is strictly facts and not biased in any way. I think this is true when it comes to what I'm reading on your page. My article did not have any sources and I still have not really gotten to that so I know I have more to work on. What I'm seeing is that you've added more references since the beginning and found a lot of external links! I've never heard of or seen this statue before and was excited to read about it. Although I have no previous knowledge I feel like your page does a good job of helping me understand its history. In my opinion, you're doing a great job! Keep up the good work!