User talk:Luna perige

Regarding your edits to Greater ʻAmakihi:
Your recent edit to Greater ʻAmakihi (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 14:10, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your edits to ʻUla-ʻai-Hawane:
Your recent edit to ʻUla-ʻai-Hawane (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 14:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Now listen to me LUNA
I do not know who you are, your ambitions in life or if you have already acheived them (you do not have a user page you wiki part timer!).

And so to business..

Your recent edits have comprised of "sand box" edits to encyclopedic articles, creating pointless articles (it may be true but it is not very informative is it? You have no sources nor have you given any indication that you wish to in the near future.) and edit warring with yourself. Fun Fun Fun... Now you stop this Luna. Soon. GOD 18:38, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Test Edits
According to the rules and customs of Wikipedia you should use a sandbox for test edits. Please do so. Lavateraguy 01:09, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Mountain Pollenpeeper
A template has been added to the article Mountain Pollenpeeper, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. NeilN 01:48, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Yellow Pollenpeeper
A template has been added to the article Yellow Pollenpeeper, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. NeilN 01:52, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Pluvialas
A template has been added to the article Pluvialas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. NeilN 01:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Foliumaves
A template has been added to the article Foliumaves, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. NeilN 03:53, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

"Eoireitum" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Eoireitum. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 13 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)