User talk:Lunamoths/Medusa (Rubens)

Peer review
The overall language used here was neutral, and I did not sense any bias or opinion when reading. The lead section is clear and direct; each heading informs the reader what will be expected to be discussed, making it easy to understand. The structure mentioned is clear, and so far, the coverage is balanced, from talking about the artist to the artwork and the symbolism behind them, as well as the historical context of the painting. You are going toward the right path; if you remained neutral and stated the facts, everything should go well; with that being said, be careful choosing your sources and making sure they are reliable. I don't have much feedback or advice as it is pretty well structured, and knowing it is still a work in progress. I am also taking in advice from reading and seeing the layout of your article in my account as a reference to look at when doing my paper. Se7enteen-century (talk) 05:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)