User talk:Lunar Blitz9

Welcome!
Hi Lunar Blitz9! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Schazjmd  (talk)  13:18, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

About Carlton W. Reeves
Hi, I wanted to explain about my revert on Carlton W. Reeves. Primary sources are to be avoided in biographies. His finding in the Jamison v McClendon will only be notable and appropriate for inclusion in the article if there is reliable, independent coverage of it, and at that time we should rely on the information in the secondary sources, not on the primary document. Also, please read about synthesis and original research to learn more about what we should not do when we write articles. For example, you wrote Reeves' opinion opened by listing nineteen police killings of black Americans and linked to articles about specific killings, however the opinion did not name those victims, it only listed the circumstances of deaths-by-police. If a secondary source draws the connection between his written opinion and those specific cases, then we can rely on that secondary source, but the editor should never make their own conclusions. And your summary about the Fourth Circuit and Justice Thomas is pure original research.Please don't let this discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia. There are a lot of restrictions on what we can write, most particularly for biographies of living people, but you'll get the hang of it in time. If what I've said doesn't make sense or you have any questions, please ask. You can reply to me here if you want, I'll watch your talk page. Happy editing! Schazjmd  (talk)  13:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I understand and respect everything in this reversion except your statement that judicial opinion didn't name the black Americans killed by police that I listed. The footnotes for the opinion listed, by name, every single one of them in the footnotes. I wasn't editorializing here. Read the footnotes! Lunar Blitz9