User talk:Lungemacs

Speedy deletion nomination of Quality villas
Hello Lungemacs,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Quality villas for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:24, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Quality villas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quality villas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Quality villas until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 13:55, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Lungemacs, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Blocked
This account is blocked as a sock further to Long-term abuse/Orangemoody/Accounts, based on both technical (CheckUser) and behavioural/editing pattern evidence. It is performed by a bot authorized to block accounts for this specific sockpuppetry investigation. This is a CheckUser block. Please refer any unblock request to the CheckUser team, either at Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations or through the Functionaries-en mailing list. EgressBot (talk) 23:23, 31 August 2015 (UTC)