User talk:Luthar28

Welcome
Hello  and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.  ''Click here to reply to this message.''  ukexpat (talk) 18:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Women of the Apocalypse
I have nominated Women of the Apocalypse, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Women of the Apocalypse. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ukexpat (talk) 14:54, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Women-of-the-Apocalypse-Cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Women-of-the-Apocalypse-Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:46, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Women of the Apocalypse
Thanks for the message. I don't think one review is going to be enough. Please take a look at WP:NBOOK. – ukexpat (talk) 01:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)


 * See point one of WP:NBOOK (my bold for emphasis): The book has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works appearing in sources that are independent of the book itself...


 * Two reviews is not "multiple" IMHO. – ukexpat (talk) 01:58, 21 January 2010 (UTC)