User talk:Luther Milton DeHaven II

Nomination of Osiris Number 432 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Osiris Number 432 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Osiris Number 432 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 16:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

A few words of advice

 * 1) Wikipedia is not a medium for publishing original research.
 * 2) If you are really genuinely upset and hurt by such things as another editor expressing the opinion that you work is "mumbo jumbo", then you probably would be better off not trying to edit Wikipedia. I have suffered far worse than that at the hands of irate people who think that they have a god-given right to use Wikipedia for their own ends. Taking stuff on Wikipedia personally is a serious mistake.
 * 3) Telling people how brilliant and wonderful you are is probably not a good idea, even if it is true, because it is likely to make you look like some arrogant person who has an inflated idea of themsleves, which will make people take less notice of you, not more. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

All this and your footnote for 25920 in Astrological Ages is an insane rant by someone who was "abducted" by aliens. Go...