User talk:LutheranFacts

Welcome!

 * }

August 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Lutheran Church in Great Britain has been reverted. Your edit here to Lutheran Church in Great Britain was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://lutheranchurchingreatbritainclub.blogspot.co.uk) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest). If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bishop Jana Jeruma-Grinberga


A tag has been placed on Bishop Jana Jeruma-Grinberga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here.  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 03:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Jana Jeruma-Grinberga for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jana Jeruma-Grinberga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jana Jeruma-Grinberga until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  D u s t i *Let's talk!* 07:00, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Conflict of interest
Hello. I wonder if you are here to improve this encyclopaedia, or do you perhaps have a Conflict of interest somewhere along the line? You might want to read that link, and especially note its bolded sentence "When advancing outside interests is more important to an editor than advancing the aims of Wikipedia, that editor stands in a conflict of interest." I think this might be you it's describing - are you here because you want to make this a better encyclopaedia, or because you have some axe to grind against your bishop or ex-bishop or whatever she is? You might also want to read WP:GREATWRONGS which explains the inappropriateness of coming here to pursue a campaign. I'd respectfully suggest that you either stick to your blogs for your campaigning, or else do some proper editing here. At the moment I have absolutely no faith in your actions and I will be watching, and if necessary will seek help from an administrator if I think that might help prevent you from causing damage. DBaK (talk) 07:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)