User talk:Luv2fuc

Nikki Hobden
Hi there. I've just re-deleted the article you created on Nikki Hobden. This is because the community made a decision (as can be seen at Articles for deletion/Nikki hobden) that she did not meet the notability requirements. If you feel that this deletion was in error, you can request a review at deletion review. I can restore the page to your userspace for you to work on if you prefer, but please note that you need to address the concerns raised in the initial deletion discsussion. Thanks. Ged UK  12:57, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Reliable Sources
I've noticed you've added some sources to the article you're developing on your talk page since it was deleted from Wikipedia mainspace but please read WP:RS to see the type of sources that are suitable, many of those added such as Facebook are not realible and cannot be used in the article also many of the ones you have added seem to contain more pictures and adverts than content, so are unlikely to be usable. Gasta220 (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)


 * For inclusion the article must meet notability criteria set out at WP:PORNBIO or WP:BIO. As you can see on WP:PORNBIO one of the criteria could be that the person has won a well known award, so if you've won any then it would be worth mentioning and your article probably wouldn't be deleted again. Feel free to message me again if you want any more help. Gasta220 (talk) 17:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikki Hobden (porn star)
A tag has been placed on Nikki Hobden (porn star) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 20:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
This account, , has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

Names should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or related to a "real-world" group or organization. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:
 * Add  You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Articles for deletion nomination of Nikki Hobden (porn star)
I have nominated Nikki Hobden (porn star), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Nikki Hobden (porn star). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ttonyb1 (talk) 04:16, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nikki Hobden (porn star)
A tag has been placed on Nikki Hobden (porn star), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 14:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nikki Hobden concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nikki Hobden, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:00, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nikki Hobden


Hello Luv2fuc. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Nikki Hobden".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)