User talk:Luvtoteachart

File permission problem with File:A.I.R. Gallery, 155 Plymouth Street, Brooklyn, NY, Jacqueline Ferrante, gallery assistant.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:A.I.R. Gallery, 155 Plymouth Street, Brooklyn, NY, Jacqueline Ferrante, gallery assistant.jpg, which you've attributed to Jacqueline Ferrante. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 01:41, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mary Grigoriadis


A tag has been placed on Mary Grigoriadis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.airgallery.org/mary-grigoriadis. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:57, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Loretta Dunkelman


A tag has been placed on Loretta Dunkelman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://accolagriefen.com/artists/loretta-dunkelman. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mighty Glen (talk) 16:59, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Maude Boltz


A tag has been placed on Maude Boltz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.airgallery.org/maude-boltz. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:02, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Susan Williams (artist)


The article Susan Williams (artist) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Little indication of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Derek Andrews (talk) 21:46, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Laurace James


The article Laurace James has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "no indication of notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Derek Andrews (talk) 21:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)


 * I see you contested this and other PRODs. I must draw your attention to WP:1E. Unless there is anything else to make her notable, this article and others like it, should be redirected to AIR Gallery. Derek Andrews (talk) 22:53, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * You might also take a look at references for AIR Gallery. I have put a citation needed tag on the opening claim of notability as a claim of importance like this really does need a clear reference. Ideally it should be something that predates the origins of the article, to be sure that we don't have a circular reference. I took a look at early versions of that article and it went unsourced for a long time, and the wording of the claim changed somewhat with time. This all makes me very cautious about the reliability of the article. It doesn't help that all but one reference are not online. Perhaps you have access to them? Derek Andrews (talk) 23:17, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Luvtoteachart, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Derek Andrews (talk) 23:25, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Email
Hi, I've responded to your email and offered some further advice. You should definitely check out WikiProject Women in Red. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  09:02, 6 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi there! Yes, please check out Women in Red! We would love to work with you. We have some essays you might find useful, we run virtual events 365 days/year, and, maybe most importantly, we are a friendly group of editors. Like the Teahouse (I'll give you a link to that, too), Women in Red is an awesome place to meet people, and ask questions. What makes us unique is that at Women in Red, you can learn more about Wikipedia content focused on women's biographies, women's works, and women's issues, broadly construed. Also, feel free to connect with me on my talkpage. --Rosiestep (talk) 20:27, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Rachel bas-Cohain) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Rachel bas-Cohain, Luvtoteachart!

Wikipedia editor Mduvekot just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks, I've listed a few more sources on the talk page that you might find useful if you want to expand the article."

To reply, leave a comment on Mduvekot's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mduvekot (talk) 02:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Laurace James) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Laurace James, Luvtoteachart!

Wikipedia editor Vexations just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks!"

To reply, leave a comment on Vexations's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Vexations (talk) 21:36, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Meetups #87, #88, #89, #90
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April Events
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:32, 22 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging