User talk:LuxembourgLover

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi LuxembourgLover! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:21, Monday, November 20, 2023 (UTC)

March 2024
Your edit to Lot Smith Cavalry Company has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 00:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC)


 * A vast majority of the article is form the source, are you telling me I could just reword for the article? LuxembourgLover (talk) 23:49, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * That's how we create articles: everything you add to Wikipedia needs to be written in your own words. — Diannaa (talk) 00:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks. LuxembourgLover (talk) 02:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

I found this source that would be really good. Epachamo (talk) 21:03, 17 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Nice! Good find. LuxembourgLover (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Chuck Norris, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. ''Stop the disruptive editing and POV-pushing. Plus WP:CIR-concern. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is no excuse for your disruptive editing.'' The Banner  talk 22:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)


 * What are you talking about? I know he is not known for his military service. Elvis Presley is also not known for his military service but he has the same thing. I don't know what you are doing but saying the same thing is not going to help anyone inpove. LuxembourgLover (talk) 23:01, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * And again an WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS-argument.But it makes clear that you fail to understand the differences between the military service of Chuck Norris (worth 2 short paragraphs) and Elvis Presley (worth a separate article: Military career of Elvis Presley). Your constant failure to judge the value of a fact, is what makes me doubt your competency to edit Wikipedia. The Banner  talk 23:26, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Morgon Freeman has one pargrpah yet has an infobox. LuxembourgLover (talk) 23:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I have started a discussion about that on Talk:Morgan Freeman. The Banner  talk 09:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Help needed
I would like to request another perspective on edits made by TheBanner. I am uncertain about their intentions, as they seem to be consistently reverting many edits, often citing WP:CIR, I know my edits are not perfet however I have seen problems. For instance, my addition of a military service module on Chuck Norris's page—similar to those on Morgan Freeman and Elvis Presley—was removed with the rationale that Norris is "not known for his military service." Although this is true, the inclusion of such a module can be informative. Furthermore, there have been issues regarding WP:Civility; TheBanner has described my edits as "cringe" and made sarcastic remarks, asserting that competence supersedes civility. This focus on my contributions has been puzzling, and I would appreciate an external review. My editing history is publicly accessible, and I anticipate that TheBanner might respond to this discussion. I am simply seeking additional opinions on this matter. LuxembourgLover (talk) 23:22, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * In fact, I have a serious concern about his competency to edit Wikipedia. The Banner  talk 23:28, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The help me tag is really not for complaints about another editor, please take it to relevent noticeboards - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail

History of Luxembourg
I have again reverted your edit on History of Luxembourg. It was again a copy&paste from Luxembourg rebellions, except that you added a source that does not back up the claim. Sorry. The Banner talk 16:04, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * how does the source not back up the claim. The event is well sourced the the article. Why don't you just fix the problem and not revert all the edits. LuxembourgLover (talk) 18:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Texas tower shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Guns in the United States.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Newspapers.com
Hi LuxembourgLover. I'm not sure if you already know this or not, so apologies if you do, but as an extended-confirmed editor in good standing you have access to Newspapers.com through WP:The Wikipedia Library. This may help you with drafts like Draft:Hector C. Haight. Cheers, Curbon7 (talk) 07:37, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Wow! This has been super helpfull for my drafts. Thanks, LuxembourgLover (talk) 18:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Lego Winter Village Collection
Hello, LuxembourgLover. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lego Winter Village Collection, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Use of AI generated content
Hi there. You say in the description of File:AI-Generated Venn Diagram Comparing the Morrisite War and the Waco Siege.png that ChatGPT generated the diagram for you.

If you're also using ChatGPT to generate paragraphs text for Wikipedia articles, the current advice at Large language models is that this should be stated in the edit summary.

If there's any past content you've added that you think should be flagged as AI-generated, you can add the template to the top of the relevant article or  to the top of the section that contains such text. Belbury (talk) 11:17, 11 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Would i be able to keep the picture in the venn diagram article if i correctly flag it? LuxembourgLover (talk) 15:30, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That diagram is completely irrelevant to that article. The Banner  talk 15:53, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * It's a venn diagram, how is it irrelevant? It shows how AI power has grown and can create venn diagrams. LuxembourgLover (talk) 15:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)

Can I get some clarification from you on whether edits like this one and that one were written with the assistance of an AI chatbot? Thanks. --Belbury (talk) 18:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I was looking at a newspaper and gave it to the AI, I wrote the original information but I used AI for spelling and grammar check. LuxembourgLover (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Please state in edit summaries in future when an AI has helped you to write text content. If you have written an ungrammatical sentence and an AI has made its best guess as to what you may have meant by it, you may be introducing errors into Wikipedia. Belbury (talk) 18:29, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Alright thanks. LuxembourgLover (talk) 18:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Good Source
Hey, hope things are going well, I found a good source here that would be good for the Utah Territorial Militia. It has lots of good information on the types of weapons used by the Utah Territorial Militia Epachamo (talk) 05:58, 25 May 2024 (UTC)


 * That is a good source, good find. If you want to help me, I’m looking for public domain pictures for the Lot Smith Cavalry Company and the Morrisite War. LuxembourgLover (talk) 20:24, 25 May 2024 (UTC)

Grand Ducal Gendarmerie (Luxembourg)
I understand that you want to make the article Grand Ducal Gendarmerie (Luxembourg) as spectacular as possible but by no means can you call the Luxemburg rebellions a battle. A power struggle is not the same as a battle. Please stop adding incorrect information. The Banner talk 23:08, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
M.Bitton (talk) 22:37, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

1RR violation
You have violated WP:1RR on 7 October attacks. Your first edit constitutes a revert of this edit. Please self-revert. Skitash (talk) 22:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)