User talk:Luxic/Archive 4

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 A.C. Milan season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julio Cesar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Michał Miśkiewicz
Hi there - if he featured on the senior bench, then he was a senior squad member, but one who spent some of the season with the reserve/youth team. Therefore I'd say having a Chievo loan in the 'Senior' section is accurate, but nothing about Chievo in the 'Youth' section of the infobox, and explain the situation in the prose. What do you think? Cheers, GiantSnowman 08:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of San Antonio Spurs seasons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Lucas and Larry Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 A.C. Milan season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alejandro Gomez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Dídac Vilà
Hi there LUXIC, longtime no talk,

regarding this player, please leave my inputs be. I wikilined "2012-13 La Liga", you removed it, i added trans_title to the foreign refs, you removed it. I added another ref to his Valencia move (now aborted), you removed it. That ESPN Star Sports contained more details about his transfer, much more than the Valencia CF official web one, which by the way now is dead. There is something very strange with that webpage, the sources do not seem to hold more than (a few) weeks before being out of order.

Please let's reach a compromise, please. Attentively - --AL (talk) 14:00, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Hi Vasco. I removed the wikilink to the 2012-13 La Liga season because I figured it was no longer appropriate since the deal did not materialize. However, it's not such a big issue. As for the references, I tried to use the English version of Valencia's official communication (in fact, the url ends with ?__locale=en), but I didn't realize the link was now dead. Lastly, I didn't mean to remove the ESPN article; I must have messed up with copypaste or something... I apologize for that. Luxic (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * We all make mistakes man, no need for the apologies :) --AL (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Ah, and more: you were 200% correct to remove the 2012–13 La Liga wikilink, as he will not spend that season with a La Liga club (i.e. Valencia), my bad, i have removed it. Nice work, keep it up :) --AL (talk) 20:35, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


 * No problem, man! As you said, we all make mistakes... and we are all always learning too ;-) Luxic (talk) 22:24, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Milan1901.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Milan1901.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Inter
Ho appreso dalla tua pagina utente che proveniamo dallo stesso Paese. Non ti dispiacerà se comunichiamo nella nostra lingua madre. Potresti dare un'occhiata alla correttezza sintattico-grammaticale delle didascalie nella sezione relativa alla storia e alla correttezza della sezione relativa alle statistiche del club? ps: questa didascalia: The Internazionale team at the start of the 1964–65 season, in which they won the league, the European Cup and the Intercontinental Cup sarebbe corretta? Grazie.--Dipralb (talk) 16:33, 9 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Ciao! Le didascalie mi sembrano tutte corrette, anche se riguardo la foto in questione non saprei dire esattamente quando sia stata scattata: l'Intercontinentale, all'epoca, si giocava in settembre, quindi se è una foto della stagione 1964-65 dev'essere stata fatta necessariamente dopo settembre (visto che vi si vede appunto quel trofeo). Per quanto riguarda le statistiche, ti suggerisco di fare fede al sito ufficiale dell'Inter che a questo link propone una serie di record e altre statistiche interessanti. :-) Luxic (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Be careful...
Your recent editing history at A.C. Milan shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)