User talk:Luxofluxo

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pfaffenthal-Kirchberg railway station has been accepted
 Pfaffenthal-Kirchberg railway station, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 13:14, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Pfaffenthal-Kirchberg_railway_station help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Stade de Luxembourg
hello,

may i please know why you keep deleting the "controversy concerning the name" section in the article "stade de luxembourg" ?

Letzebuergerr


 * As per Criticism, there is no need for a controversy section, and it seems that by repeatedly trying to include one you are pushing an agenda, which is contrary to NPOV. That there was any criticism of the name is made abundantly clear in the sentence: "In September 2020, the Luxembourg Chamber of Deputies rejected a petition to amend the name using the Luxembourgish language." Even that is probably overstating it, because as I gather the petition failed to get enough signatures. Luxofluxo (talk) 17:57, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
 * I see. You are probably right. My excuses.
 * However, having nearly every newspaper in Luxembourg writing about this can hardly be seen as "overstating".
 * Letzebuergerr
 * Luxembourg media can be deceiving. Just to give you an idea of how small a "controversy" it was, the official petition to change the name only gathered a total of 1,081 signatures out of the necessary 4,500 signatures required for a proper parliamentary debate. From that fact alone, I would consider removing the mentioning of the criticism of the name as just useless trivia, but I did not want to totally remove your contributions to the article. Luxofluxo (talk) 18:13, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Got it. you are right of course. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Orphaned non-free image File:Stade de Luxembourg logo, positive.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stade de Luxembourg logo, positive.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Thank you! I will cherish this retirement beer.Luxofluxo (talk) 11:02, 29 August 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Robert Schuman building
Hello, Luxofluxo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robert Schuman building, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:European Convention Center Luxembourg
Hello, Luxofluxo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:European Convention Center Luxembourg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ARBPIA warning
If I see further commentary like this or this you will be topic banned. Implying that other editors are antisemites or there is a group of editors on a mission to subvert NPOV is unacceptable. If you have evidence of disruptive editing take it to WP:AE or WP:ANI. Again, just so I'm perfectly clear, if this behavior recurs you will be topic banned. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:42, 2 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I think it's pretty obvious that there is. Just look at their edit histories and when these accounts appeared. Luxofluxo (talk) 01:43, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Then make your case at the correct venue and stop with the aspersions. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)