User talk:Luxtaythe2nd/Archives/2021/September

Foster's reactance theorem
I'm glad that there is now consensus over the short description of this article, but I feel that I still need to speak to you about your behaviour over this. You reinserted the same material three times. And that was after it had already been removed three times earlier. Our verifiability policy, one of our core content policies, says this; "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material." You must not put back material that has been challenged without providing a citation for it. There are no exemptions to this, not even for short descriptions. Besides which, it is always better to take the issue to talk the first time you are reverted per the WP:BRD advice. SpinningSpark 07:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

GAN reviewing process
Hi Luxtaythe2nd, thank you for your assistance in reviewing at WP:Good article nominations. When you have pass a nomination you have reviewed, please remember to add it to the appropriate list of Good articles. All steps that should be taken are listed at WP:GAN/I. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, CMD (talk) 10:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC)