User talk:Luxury007

Speedy deletion nomination of Viva by Cartier


A tag has been placed on Viva by Cartier, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Viva by Cartier and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 23:24, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of VIVA-sparkling liqueur
A tag has been placed on VIVA-sparkling liqueur, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 23:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)


 * you said on the article talk p. : theVIVA-sparkling liqueur wikipedia article was made in the same format as ((Jean-Marc XO Vodka)) article, in a less ambigious and promotional way, my only intention is to give more information on this liqueur.
 * However, as reviewing administrator I have deleted it, because that vodka is already notable, with references to show it, and thus a descriptive article can be written; this product is not yet even released. Therefore the article can only have been written in the hope to promote it. When it does receive reviews or substantial discussions in published sources, consider rewriting the article, but not until then. If you try reintroducing the same article under a variant title again, as you did already, you will be blocked from further contributing as a promotional-only account.  DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 6 May 2010 (UTC)