User talk:LuzAreliContreras/Androgen receptor

This is where the peer review feedback for LuzAreliContreras's sandbox draft content should be posted. Be sure to sign your post and complete the Canvas quiz to receive credit for your work. UWM.AP.Endo (talk) 15:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Peer review questions

Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes.

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes.

Are the citations formatted correctly? Yes.

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes, the information in the main article doesn't connect to the HPA or HPG axis. This information as we learned from class, is very important for students to make connections and understand the role of the receptor.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? The main article has a lot of information, a detailed and pinpointed article contribution would be sufficient.

GeoMedrek (talk) 18:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Peer review questions

Is the content written in a neutral, unbiased tone? Yes

Do the citations follow the MEDRS (Links to an external site.) (medicine, reliable sources) guidelines? Yes

Are the citations formatted correctly? Yes

Visit the main article that your classmate is contributing their new content to.

Does it make sense to add this new content to the proposed article? Yes.

Are there any other areas of the main article that your classmate could contribute to? No. The main article has a lot of information already, in my opinion. Bautis35 (talk) 05:02, 23 November 2020 (UTC)