User talk:Luzergurl

Welcome!
Hello, Luzergurl, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fallon Sousa, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Pichpich (talk) 22:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Proposed deletion of Fallon Sousa


The article Fallon Sousa has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Simply not sufficiently notable. Though I wish her the best, her career consists of self-published novellas and a screenplay for a short film that is in production and that's not enough to get the necessary significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 22:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Fallon Sousa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fallon Sousa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fallon Sousa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 14:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed the article you wrote has been proposed for deletion. I just wanted to drop by and explain why that is. Wikipedia an encyclopedia. Even though we don't print it out, we still can't include articles on everything (maintaining zillions of articles would be impossible; especially since we are all volunteers). Sometimes its easy to tell what should be written about and what shouldn't. Brad Pitt, probably notable. My favorite cat Rufus, maybe not. But most things are a bit harder to tell. So we use this basic guideline: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." Significant coverage means more than just a passing mention. Reliable, independent sources means actual news sites that aren't affiliated with the topic (e.g. we wouldn't use a company press release to determine if that company is notable).


 * In the case of Fallon Sousa, some editors saw the article, and could not find evidence that the topic is "notable" (in the sense of having significant coverage in independent sources). To get opinions from others they started a discussion at WP:Articles for deletion, where we discuss whether articles are suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. You're free (and encouraged!) to bring up other sources at that discussion for people to consider. Alternatively, it may just be too soon for an article on the topic and maybe in a few years she will have far more coverage. At that time you're more-than-welcome to recreate the article. If you have any questions feel free to ask here, at my talk page or at WP:Teahouse which is meant to be a forum where new users can ask questions about anything editing-related. I hope this doesn't discourage you from helping out around here going forward. We could use all the help we can get!! All the best! Ajpolino (talk) 16:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Fallon Sousa, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - Happysailor  (Talk) 21:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)