User talk:Lvcongo/sandbox

Peer Review: This addition to the opening section is great because it addresses the controversies that are discussed in the talk page. The only thing I would change about this part is a citation for the first theory about the paint darkening, in addition to the citation you have for the second theory. Outside of that, I would consider adding sections or at least elaborating upon the 3 types of images that are mentioned in the "Studies and Research" portion, since there is so much discussion on that topic in the talk page without there being much in the actual article. I'm guessing that's a result of other users deleting the sections that previously existed, but it would be good to see the different perspectives presented in an unbiased way. Also, the part of the first paragraph that was not written by you is lacking citations, so adding some would be good!Cawalker18 (talk) 02:02, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Maya's Peer Review
Instead of expanding upon the introduction within the wikipedia article, I think you should focus on a cross-cultural comparison of the black madonna by adding a subsection. What you added to the introduction was important but I think you could really do a lot more on this page. Your first sentence is a bit argumentative especially because you don't include a source until the end of your paragraph. I would include citations after every instance that you cite any information to be safe. Despite that, I agree with what the person who peer edited you before me said, as it doesn't look like you've changed or added anything since their review. Mayacaps (talk) 16:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)