User talk:Lwarrenwiki/Archives/2014

Scott Miller
Nothing really, I just prefer full spelling of months (i.e. January, instead of "Jan." or "Jan"). It's just personal preference. Also, some interrelated text consolidated. Quis separabit? 21:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
 * But if there is anything you really object to, just fix it as you like. It's not priority for me. Quis separabit?  21:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Game Theory Real Nighttime album back cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Game Theory Real Nighttime album back cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:04, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Game Theory Real Nighttime album back cover.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Game Theory Real Nighttime album back cover.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:12, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Cut-and-paste move
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give User:Lwarrenwiki/Pointed Accounts of People You Know a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Pointed Accounts of People You Know. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Steven Brust Question
You've recently made quite a few changes to Steven Brust's wikipedia page. I think another change should be made, unrelated to your changes, but I'd like a second opinion. Since you seem to be somewhat invested in the page, I figure you would have an educated opinion on this.

I've just begun re-reading his Vlad Taltos (Dragaeran) series chronologically, following the order on this page, and I've noticed an omission. The Prologue of the book "Jhereg" is chronologically the very first story involving Vlad -- the prologue details Vlad's acquisition of Loiosh as a familiar when Vlad is 16. Since precedent has already been set with the Dragon & Issola books being broken up on the chronological listing, I think the prologue of Jhereg should be added as the very first chronological entry.

If you agree, then please feel free to add it for me (I am inexperienced at editing wikipedia and am afraid I'll screw something up).

Alex Perrin Lxvball (talk) 13:17, 20 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Alex, thanks for the suggestion, and the vote of confidence! I believe you are right. I have been editing for only about a year, and if you make any mistakes, or find you need a hand to make it look right, I will gladly show you how to fix them up, but by all means jump in and do it. As they say around here: Be bold and learn by doing. Good luck! Lwarrenwiki (talk) 13:30, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Lord Roem ~ (talk) 23:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Scott Miller (pop musician)
I just revert a big chunk in the article. It appears you added the same material twice, including double infoboxes and ref section. Bgwhite (talk) 00:29, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Wow. That was an extreme cut-and-paste typo on my part! Odd that it didn't cause major visible errors in the rendering of the article, which is why it went unnoticed for so long. I have restored the intervening edits, and I very much appreciate your help and diligence. Thanks! Lwarrenwiki (talk) 02:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * If reverting my edits fixed it, it must have been me. I have no idea how. Sorry about that :( SteveStrummer (talk) 03:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * No, the error was mine before you touched the article. The entire article was duplicated, smack in the middle of one of the references! I guess all the brackets and braces balanced, and the citation template failed gracefully (but silently) when it encountered a parameter that was 50K long. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 03:54, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh oh oh oh, i see now! OK, good, now I can go back to listening to Lolita Nation :) SteveStrummer (talk) 04:02, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Bless your heart, Steve. I started editing Wikipedia a year ago for basically one reason: he deserved better than a stub, and if nobody else was going to do him justice, then it was up to me to try. Since then, I've gotten a lot of enjoyment from much broader involvement in Wikipedia, but this is still the article that matters most to me, and that I keep coming back and trying to improve. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 05:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Doug Gillard
 * added a link pointing to WOBC


 * Gem (band)
 * added a link pointing to Gem

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Garbage (album)
Sorry for interrupt. I should knew no one discuss for it. In 'Composition and style' section, as from Allmusic reviewer says "having all the trappings of alternative rock -- off-kilter arrangements, occasional bursts of noise, a female singer with a thin, airy voice", however it says "comes off as pop". Honestly it does not classified as a pop album. Why don't you ask User:Andrzejbanas to discuss on talk page first. 183.171.162.152 (talk) 03:07, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry, you've got the wrong person here; I don't believe I've ever edited the page for Garbage (album), and I'm afraid I have no idea what you're talking about. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 03:48, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Hooray!
Favorite music edit :D SteveStrummer (talk) 15:56, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I was hoping you'd see that edit on your watchlist! The show is tomorrow night. If only I were closer! Lwarrenwiki (talk) 15:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Music What Happened book cover.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Music What Happened book cover.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Skyler White (disambiguation)


The article Skyler White (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Only two entries, one of which has the main name. This is solved with a hatnote.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:35, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Skyler White (disambiguation) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skyler White (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Skyler White (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:44, 14 November 2014 (UTC)