User talk:Lwwpartnerships

February 2010
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Lwwpartnerships, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because your username is identical to the domain of a number of external links you have added. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. I would also recommend reviewing the conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. otherlleft 00:02, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

what is needed
I'm one of the administrators here who work frequently with articles about academic journals and their publishers. I think I need to you some advice, about what is expected here. An article about a journal should also  contain:
 * 1) Fulll titles, earlier titles used, and the corresponding dates. Make cross references from any variant titles.
 * 2) Standard abbreviations used--make redirects from them.
 * 3) publishing & sponsoring body, as well as earlier publishers & sponsors
 * 4) availability on line
 * 5) no. of articles published a year
 * 6) ISSNs for both print and online versions
 * 7) Online availability of current and earlier issues
 * 8) Open access availability, if relevant.
 * 9) Circulation (sourced somewhere--default place to get it is Ulrichs)
 * 10) coverage in major standard indexes, inclding particularly Scopus and Web of Science (Science Citation Index); if its a medical journal, PubMed and Excerpta Medica also,and Chemical abstracts if relevant,..
 * 11) latest year's impact factor if available, and rank in the JCR subject field(s). Include the year so it can be updated.
 * 12) any actual references providing substantial coverage from  3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases.
 * 13) Although BMLA is no longer publishing  the B-H core library lists, include placement on them for any journal relevant, along with  a link to the published list.
 * 14) a list of the 3 or 4 most influential articles similarly, getting citation figures from Web of Science.
 * 15) External links to the journal's main web site, and, if relevant, the main website of the sponsoring body.

It should not contain
 * 1) General information listing all the fields covered, unless it is not obvious from the title
 * 2) Statements of praise for the journal -- see WP:PEACOCK
 * 3) A list of those on the editorial board
 * 4) names of the staff, except editors in chief; subordinate or section editors should not usually be listed.
 * 5) Information about subscription prices
 * 6) Information about how to submit articles
 * 7) Links to the publisher's general website, or to subpages within the journal's site.
 * and, most important, it must contain no text from the web page description of the journal. That is a copyright violation, and needs to be rewritten. Even if you are prepared to donate copyright according to WP:DCM, it is likely to be unsuitably promotional.

Please read  our FAQ  about  organisations, and articles like this, and for more specific information our  WikiProject Academic Journals/Writing guide. As it specifies there, the best way to start is by using   the infobox journal template; but also convert the information there  to prose.

A good deal of this you did right for Journal of Hypertension ‎, but there is more to do, especially the infobox. I think it highly likely that every journal published by W&W could be shown to be appropriate for a Wikipedia article, but it will be necessary to show it to those who disagree.

And, as otherleft says above, you really do need to choose another user name; we have a rule that only individuals can edit, and that the name cannot indicate the name of an organization, to avoid the appearance that they control the page. On the new page, declare your affiliation. And be careful about WP:Conflict of Interest !

If I can help you with any of this, please let me know.  DGG ( talk ) 03:36, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Although Wikipedia has a great many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See FAQ/Organization for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text below this message box.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames.  Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  04:23, 13 February 2010 (UTC)