User talk:LycheeDragonLoverBACKUP

CS1 error on Astragalus dactylocarpus
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Astragalus dactylocarpus, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox/43&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20LycheeDragonLoverBACKUP&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d=&preloadparams%5b%5d=1167478526 report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:04, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Astragalus_dactylocarpus&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1167478526%7CAstragalus%20dactylocarpus%5D%5D Ask for help])

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, LycheeDragonLoverBACKUP. Thank you for your work on Artemisia laciniata. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   03:01, 9 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I’ll add more to the article as I go!
 * LycheeDragonLoverBACKUP (talk) 06:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)
 * LycheeDragonLoverBACKUP (talk) 06:30, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lupinus saxosus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howell. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Glad to See You Back
I worried when your previous account was not editing that you'd given up on Wiki editing. Glad to see you back. Also: I did a lupin page because you inspired me, Lupinus caudatus. It is another one that ranges from Colorado to Washington so I hope you like it. Or if it is missing something I hope you might add it. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 04:41, 20 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Great page! There was really nothing missing. I just added the Lupinus category to it. I’m wondering how you found around 30 references for the page. I usually just copy the species name into google and find my references there, and the most I find is around 10.
 * LycheeDragonLoverBACKUP (talk) 18:51, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Mostly I just do websearches when I have something specific too look for that I know, but I need to prove. Like when I have heard people using a common name but none of my sources have said it so far. Or when I'm looking for cultivation information using a site search using name plus site:.edu to get me mostly university extension pages.
 * I have most of my tricks listed on my user page. For example I go to archive.org and do a text search for the species or synonyms. First with quotes "Lupinus caudatus" and then without quotes to really dig deep and find mentions where it is "L. caudatus" in a longer article about Lupins. Or I'll start backtracking from Plants of the World Online. They list the original publication and date for species so with a bit of work I can find what the first botanist said about it. Speaking of that, I ought to see what Kellogg wrote about it, it could be interesting.
 * Plus some of that long list of references is just different pages on POWO, one for each subspecies so that it would be easier on future people to find the same information like all the synonyms I put in for each subspecies. And the complicated disagreements that botanists have about Lupinus generally. So more stuff to explain. Aster (genus) ends up being like that as well.
 * Edit to add: Here is an example of me working. Just started today on a new page in one of my sandboxes User:MtBotany/sandkasten. I started at POWO and then went to archive.org and the biodiversity heritage library to find the two places it was described. I got some useful color about when/how the plant was named and I'm already up to three references. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 21:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I’ll look to see if I can find any description info on that species, if you don’t mind other people editing your sandbox.
 * LycheeDragonLoverBACKUP (talk) 22:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * A source that is really useful is,https://www.fs.usda.gov/database/feis/plants/forb/wyeamp/all.html#:~:text=GENERAL%20BOTANICAL%20CHARACTERISTICS%20%3A%20Mule%2Dears,heads%20may%20occasionally%20be%20solitary. It has over 30 references, lots of description info, and even info on the effects of fire on the plant.
 * LycheeDragonLoverBACKUP (talk) 22:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, yeah! I love FEIS. Both for it being a one place to get all sorts of great information, but also to find the sources so I can often cite those directly. I used it a buncha times for my Lupinus work because Flora of North America has not yet published their legume family stuff yet. I should add them to my tips. They don't have every wildflower, but they have a lot of the important ones.
 * FNA actually has a good and complete description and a key on the page for the genus. http://floranorthamerica.org/Wyethia_amplexicaulis
 * I would be happy to have you join in, I'll just move and rename the page to the mainspace when it is done so you get proper credit for your work. Afterwards I'll blank the redirect left behind for a new project. Also, be aware I'm only editing until about the 26th this month and then I'm back in October. Nothing bad happening, just going to be incredibly busy having fun for a month. There may even be botanical pictures...
 * Edit to add: Also, if you ever ambitious enough to want to work on a table of all the plants for Washington State like my Draft:Flora of Colorado, let me know. I'd be happy to download the POWO data for you. It all has to be checked by hand and the common names added, you could decide if you wanted to put in NatureServe state status or not. I am because I think it makes it more useful even though it is a lot of work. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 01:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
 * FNA actually has a good and complete description and a key on the page for the genus. http://floranorthamerica.org/Wyethia_amplexicaulis
 * I would be happy to have you join in, I'll just move and rename the page to the mainspace when it is done so you get proper credit for your work. Afterwards I'll blank the redirect left behind for a new project. Also, be aware I'm only editing until about the 26th this month and then I'm back in October. Nothing bad happening, just going to be incredibly busy having fun for a month. There may even be botanical pictures...
 * Edit to add: Also, if you ever ambitious enough to want to work on a table of all the plants for Washington State like my Draft:Flora of Colorado, let me know. I'd be happy to download the POWO data for you. It all has to be checked by hand and the common names added, you could decide if you wanted to put in NatureServe state status or not. I am because I think it makes it more useful even though it is a lot of work. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 01:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lupinus elmeri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Greene.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)