User talk:Lyddonian

Edits to Mark Eden
Hi Lyddonian -- Thanks for removing nonreliable sources and replacing with The Guardian obituary, however we cannot just use the Guardian's words as they are copyrighted; it's necessary to rewrite everything in your own words. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 01:08, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Charles Campion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tiverton. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Genealogical information
Self-published websites such as "thepeerage" are not considered reliable. Please see Reliable sources/Perennial sources for further guidance. Edwardx (talk) 15:04, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Jo Johnson
Please self-revert your edit on Charlotte Johnson Wahl. Baron Johnson of Marylebone is just a title, not Jo Johnson's real name. If you continue edit-warring I'll complain you to the admins. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 22:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Per MOS:HONORIFIC: Except for the initial reference and infobox, do not add honorific titles to existing instances of a person's name where they are absent, because doing so implies that the existing version is incorrect (similar in spirit to the guideline on English spelling differences). Similarly, honorific titles should not be deleted when they are used throughout an article unless there is consensus. Where the use of an honorific title is widely misunderstood, this can be mentioned in the article; see, for example, Bob Geldof. Honorific titles used with forenames only (such as "Sir Elton", "Sir David", "Dame Judi") should be avoided unless this form is so heavily preferred in popular usage that the use of the surname alone would render the entire name unrecognizable. I ask you to stop adding Jo Johnson's title. LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm Nardog. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Jack Windsor Lewis, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 04:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

David Beetham
Dear Lyddonian, I hope is OK to bother you and thanks for your additions and help on the page on David Beetham. Do you have any more sources that can be used to support some of the info added. Is Margaret Newbigin for example the "Home Is Where" Margaret Newbigin Beetham - the daughter of Lesslie Newbigin and could there be a page on Margaret Newbigin  - should she be red inked on the page on David Beetham? No worries if not - or not interested. (Msrasnw (talk) 10:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC))


 * Hello, I used the sources I added to the piece and also the freebmd site (https://www.freebmd.org.uk/cgi/search.pl) to trace the wife's maiden name. I was able to cross-check accuracy with the birth records of the two daughters named in the Leeds University obituary.  I'm afraid I'm unaware of any connection between Margaret Newbigin and Lesslie Newbigin. Lyddonian (talk) 10:54, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks (Msrasnw (talk) 11:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC))

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited St James' Church, Mere Green, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mere Green.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)