User talk:Lydia.Skarivoda/sandbox

Article Evaluation 9/23 National Organization for Women Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Yes, each section makes sense in the article and is on topic. Is there anything that distracted you? There are a couple brackets that said "citation needed" and the subtitle "Organizational media" only has one sentence. Is any information out of date? No Is anything missing that could be added? A more in depth section on each president possibly? Just an idea. What else could be improved? There is a link at the bottom under "See also" that brings you to a section in the article itself and not to a separate article. This should be changed or deleted. Also, the "Background" section is rather long and disorganized. May added subtitles would ease readability. Is the article neutral? Yes, it has a section about criticism that points out the weak points as well as highlighting accomplishments in a neutral tone initially. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, it seems pretty neutral. Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? It seems to have been written by someone who supports the group so it is positively talked about but doesn't seem biased at the same time. Check a few citations. Do the links work? Yes! Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes! Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Yes! Where does the information come from? The official website for the NOW organization and other credible sources.