User talk:LydiaDx

Image copyright problem with Image:O'Neil Promo 17a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:O'Neil Promo 17a.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 03:26, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:OD17a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:OD17a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 07:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? MER-C 07:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:O'Neil Promo 17a.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:O'Neil Promo 17a.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

O'Neil De Noux
Hi there. It seems you've added a lot of information to the article about this author. Unfortunately, it went directly against our policy for biographies of living people as it was completely unsourced. As a result, I've removed the main body of the article. Please do not restore it - it will probably be removed again. I'll give you a few reasons why this happened: If you want to discuss this further, you can take it the article's talk page, or my own talk page. Thanks. Ooh Bunnies! Leave a message 19:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Everything on Wikipedia must have a source, preferably a reliable, published source, independent of the subject. For biographies of living people (BLPs) the policy is especially strict, for legal reasons. If you read the policy page I linked you, it explains it in detail.
 * I checked the author's own website which was linked in the article, and found a link to the Wikipedia page itself. Wikipedia is not for hosting a detailed biography on someone, especially one that was written in a non-neutral tone. It should be the other way around. Wikipedia is for bare facts, backed up by sources. A biography like that would be better suited to the author's website.
 * Because the author's website contained a link to the Wikipedia page, this suggests to me that you may be personally related to the subject, and editing under a conflict of interest, as it implies that you wrote that content for that specific purpose.
 * References should be cited with inline citations. For a guide on how to do that, see referencing for beginners.

Nomination of Derringer Award for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Derringer Award is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Derringer Award until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 23:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: O'Neil De Noux (April 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Phospheros were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:O'Neil De Noux and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:O'Neil De Noux, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:O%27Neil_De_Noux Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Phospheros&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:O%27Neil_De_Noux reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Phospheros (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:O'Neil De Noux


Hello, LydiaDx. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "O'Neil De Noux".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)