User talk:Lygu1560

Welcome!
Hello, Lygu1560, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Paleo Neonate  – 18:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Christ myth theory
I see that another editor already reverted your recent changes there. Per WP:BRD and WP:CONSENSUS, please attempt to first form consensus at that article's talk page (Talk:Christ myth theory) before reinstating your edits. Thank you, — Paleo Neonate  – 18:39, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for trying, anyway. Frankly this article is appalling. The topic is sort of fascinating, because of the absolute 100% conviction of historicity by the tiny proportion of the "Bible scholars" who are not religious. But when the genuine enquirer tries to find out what (independent) historical evidence there is, we are told it is simply overwhelming. Or perhaps it's three sentences by Roman authors. Then we are told we couldn't possibly understand the "methods" of historians (after all, Casey's abusive rant tells us none of the mythicists do, either). But we ask again: then we are told that actually this tiniest thread of evidence is more than we have for more or less anyone else in history who was "non-elite". So Jesus is the least historically supported figure except for a lot of people I've never heard of. Well, which is it? (Sorry to rant) Imaginatorium (talk) 19:34, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * You have ignored the advice from User:PaleoNeonate above to get consensus on the talk page before you try to make those changes to the section "Scholarly reception" on Christ myth theory. Stop doing it. Every word of that article has been arrived at through multiple discussions over years, you cannot just barge in and start re-writing it on your own. And never mark an edit as "minor" unless it is something like a spelling mistake or a missing apostrophe. Doing that can get you blocked. Those edits were far from minor.Smeat75 (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)