User talk:Lymantria

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! SJP (talk) 06:41, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Vlinderartikelen
Ah, goed werk. Ik zal eens kijken of ik het artikel meteen voor nl kan maken als ik er één maak. Moet me wel even verdiepen in de opbouw op nl, want die is een beetje anders dan de Engelse versie. Waar haal je trouwens al die foto's vandaan? Ik zie dat je bij elk artikel dat je maakt een foto hebt, ik kan van een heleboel soorten geen foto's vinden. Ruigeroeland (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Maak je niet teveel zorgen om de opbouw van NL-artikelen. De categorie is in het algemeen de familie, en dier uit het ... gebied. Die foto's, daar ben ik altijd naar op zoek. Zonder foto vind ik een vlinderartikel niet echt zinvol. Dus eerst de foto, dan het artikel. Ik zag dat je ook de collectie van Donald Hobern op Flickr hebt ontdekt. De Europese exemplaren van hem heb ik doorgelopen op macro nachtvlinders - regelmatig upload ik er een of twee, en een tijdje later maak ik het bijbehorende artikel. Dat is bijna gedaan. Maar er zijn nog zoveel meer foto's! De micro's, de Australische/Nieuw-Zeelandse.... Een andere bron is http://www.insectimages.org/. Wel oppassen, want niet altijd is de licentie goed (m.n. de restrictie Niet-Commercieel). Lymantria (talk) 17:32, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

Vertaling
Goed werk! Was van plan wat meer Noord-Amerikaanse soorten toe te voegen. Staan er betrekkelijk weining van op wikipedia tot nog toe, dus wellicht heb je wat meer te vertalen in de toekomst. Ruigeroeland (talk) 08:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Human Rights and POV
Hello Lymantria, the reason I addressed JZ85 was because his previous encounter with a user made him bias, thus forcing him to promote his POV here, trying to influence a referee to see his POV. It seems to me that he should at the very least think about the bias his action contains and consider the larger issue of the basic human right to freedom of speech involved. I have not made a formal complaint since I assumed his good will. That is why I asked him decently to consider his actions. He repaid me with slander however, which again proves his bias and therewith the inappropriate function he holds at nl.wiki. I hope that you can see the importance of letting go of previous encounters as bias towards a new encounter, since it is mandated in any court case to view trials separately so the verdicts may be unbiased. Even though I view your mention of support towards him as a similarly biased action, showing a POV, I hope you will refrain from adding such biased static in the future. Any dispute should be settled between two users without the involvement of other users or referees. If other users or referees get involved clearly something is wrong with the user needing such involvement. Since I have not made any formal complaint yet and am trying to talk things over in a decent manner so he will start to think about what exactly he is doing it seems to me that you should stay out of this. I would appreciate it if you would since I think JZ85 needs to consider his own POV and his neglecting a basic human right and trying to influence a referee for his POV. Thank you in advance. --Faust (talk) 18:08, 23 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Addition: I apologise for not changing the username. I made MoiraMoira the same request you see; or rather: you the same request as her.

Not so. If I feel myself to use the JZ85 talk page to support him with a little joke for whatever reason, there cannot by any reason I should not do so, other than that JZ85 wouldn't like it. Furhtermore, the accusations of violation of Human Rights are severe, but without any firm ground. You seem to mix up "Freedom of speech" with "Obligation to publish". The latter is not one of the Human Rights. This way of discussing by extreme but clearly false accusations in my honest opinion is unethical. Lymantria (talk) 18:39, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello Lymatra, I am very serious in my remark that trying to silence an individual is a serious offense. I have not made a case out of it however, because the referee has judged on the basis of other considerations. I do feel JZ85 should reflect on his actions though and I am sorry to read that you misunderstand me and the universal human rights. --Faust (talk) 08:53, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Do you have the slightest indication that JZ85 is trying to silence you outside wikipedia? As within nl-wikipedia he is one of the persons appointed by the wikipedia-community to do so if necessary on behalf of the community. And that does not come close to bounderies of freedom of speech, as that freedom does not imply that a third party (newspaper, radiostation, tv-station, website, or whatever) has an obligation to publish anything that is put forward.
 * If you have problems with the decision taken by nl-wikipedia on your behalf, you should bring it under consideration there (you might write the ArbCom), and you should not harass some of the nl-wikipedia administrators here with grotesque complains and export your problems this way to other wiki-projects. Lymantria (talk) 11:49, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Flickr review
Not sure what that was all about. I used the upload wizard to upload these photos. Next thing I know, a bot is coming by doing some kind of tagging about Flickr. Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 17:59, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. I fixed it. Perhaps next time you might look into it yourself, if this happens again. Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 07:50, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Why you obstruct me in Wikipedia Commons?
Why you obstruct me in the Wikipedia Commons?I need to nail up photos in their.If you  says evil words which describes me again,you  will be seal in Wikipedia.--點蟲蟲  8:40, 5 February 2021 (HK Time)
 * You uploaded copyrighted material, were warned not to do so, but continued. Lymantria (talk) 07:52, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry for this thing 🙇🏻‍♂️🙇🏻‍♂️🙇🏻‍♂️because I am a new user and I don't know how to post new photos.Can you teach me how to post new photos in Wikipedia Commons,thanks!--點蟲蟲 9:25, 5 February 2021 (HK Time)

Regarding an email
-- Gpkp  [ u • t • c ] 05:49, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Ahad Raza Mir (2021).jpg and File:Iqra Aziz during an interview.jpg
Please, pass the licence review of these files. RoyalCharm (talk) 07:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
 * As far as I can see both videos @YouTube don't use the free license. Lymantria (talk) 07:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)