User talk:Lynchy66

Little context in The mezz
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The mezz, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The mezz is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The mezz, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 02:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Griffin. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Angel Of  Sadness  16:52, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Harry potter and the order of the pheonix
I've nominated Harry potter and the order of the pheonix, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Harry potter and the order of the pheonix satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Harry potter and the order of the pheonix and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Harry potter and the order of the pheonix during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Angel Of  Sadness  16:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC)