User talk:Lyndenchristianlyncs

Regarding your additions to Lynden Christian Schools
The recent edit you made has been reverted, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please also the Wikipedia guideline on conflicts of interest. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Please stop adding copyrighted material to the article. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:32, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you add copyrighted material to the article again, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Account blocked
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

AfD nomination of Lynden Christian Schools
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Lynden Christian Schools. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Lynden Christian Schools. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 6 December 2009 (UTC)