User talk:Lyndon Jamison/Christian views on environmentalism

Hey, this is a test. (Lyndon Jamison (talk) 16:29, 15 March 2021 (UTC))

This article so far has neutral point of view that seeks to inform the reader. The sources vary from direct mission statements to more objective studies. Overall, the sources seem reliable, but may need more objective variance. Julienpleb (talk) 21:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Article is about the opinion of a group of people, so you have stated it in the most neutral way. Sources seem good as well. Maybe just add links to the organizations pages, so people can understand who they are more. Great start! Staylor1325 (talk) 22:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

The sources are very numerous and varied, the information does not make the article unbalanced, great job. Matthewgaar (talk) 21:53, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Great job so far. Good reference to sources! Staylor1325 (talk) 21:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

You have lots of good information and it's well organized. A few suggestions: Talk less about books/authors and give us instead some content from them. For example, rather than tell us about Mark Stoll and his book, give us the names of some of these Presbyterian environmentalists and their accomplishments? (Still cite Stoll, of course.) Similarly, I think you could provide fewer topic sentences and more detailed evidence throughout. For example, can you give us more content on the 'Earth Care Pledge'? Or can you give us specific example of Quaker environmental action? You have a very good framework but could definitely fill it out with more concrete evidence of people and activities. Brendankarch (talk) 17:40, 31 March 2021 (UTC)