User talk:Lyndon raul

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 2010 Northumbria Police manhunt, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: 2010 Northumbria Police manhunt was changed by Lyndon raul (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95645 on 2010-12-28T15:39:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:39, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Template:Random portal component/doc. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 17:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Lothar von Richthofen, you may be blocked from editing. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 17:17, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Raoul supercool moat. aka rouly


Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Raoul supercool moat. aka rouly, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lothar von Richthofen (talk) 17:06, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Lyndon cole, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Alexandr Dmitri (talk) 17:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 17:27, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

I HAVE BEEN UNFAIRLY BLOCKED, VANDALISM ACCOUNT.
TO WHOM THIS DOES CONCERN WE HAVE BEEN BLOCKED AS ACCOUNT HAS VIEWED AND UPDATED TO VANDALISM ACCOUNT. I WISH TO STRONGLY DISPUTE THIS AND WOULD LIKE IT TO GO ON RECORD THAT MY ACCOUNT IS NOT VANDALISM AT ALL AND IF IT HAS BEEN VIEWED IN THIS WAY THEN WE APOLOGISE, IT WAS NOT OUR INTENTION TO CAUSE OFFENCE OR VANDALISE IN ANYWAY. WE WOULD TO TO SAY SORRY FOR ANY OFFENCE WE MAY HAVE CAUSED. BUT PLEASE TAKE TIME TO READ OUR OUR ARTICLES AS WE HAVE DISPLAYED CLEAR DISCLAIMERS AND SO BELIEVE THAT SUFFICIENT WARNING HAS BEEN PROVIDEED THAT THE READERS CONCEPTION IS THEIR CHOICE AND IN NO WAY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OUR EDITS, WE ARE NEW USERS OF WIKIPEDIA AND BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE MADE IT CLEAR THAT THE FACTS ARE REPORTED BUT PEOPLES INTERPRETATION OF THEM FACTS ARE COMPLETELY OUT OF OUR CONTROL. ANY ADVICE OR HELP WOULD BE GRATEFULLY RECEIVED. PLEASE LOOK INTO THIS MATTER AND INFORM US OF THE DECISION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THANKS

HANG ON
pLEASE READ EARLIER THREAD THAT WE DIDNT SIGN, THIS SITE IS VERY CONFUSING AS A NEW USER? THIS IS LYNDON RAUL REPORTING AN UNFAIR BLOCKING. PLEASE TAKE TIME TO READ EARLIER THREAD AND ALL POSTS. WE ARE NOT VANDALISERS IN ANY WAY. WE NEED CONFIRMATION OF YOUR DECISION AS IF WE ARE UNABLE TO USE THIS SITE THEN WE NEED TO REPORT OUR INFORMATION TO THE PUBLIC ELSEWHERE. COLLECTIVELY WE CALL OURSELVES THE INFAMOUS DUO AND HAVE NO ACTUAL VERIFIED LINKS TO RAUL MOAT, LYNDON COLE, BEN WOGG, TOM CARRICK/COOL OR COREY COOL. WE HAVE OBTAINED OUR INFORMATION FROM RELIABLE SOURCES AND TRUSTED SOURCES AND QUITE TO STAND UP FOR THE INFORMATION WE HAVE POSTED AS WE STRONGLY BELIEVE WE ARE NOT DOING ANYTHING IRRESPONSIBLE AT ALL. IF THE DECISION IS TO BLOCK US PERMANTLEY CAN U PLEASE DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF WOT FACTS R BEING DISPUTED AND WE MORE THAN HAPPY TO PROVE OTHERWISE :) MANY THANKS THE INFAMOUS DUO, PIONEERS IN THIS NEWLY FOUND WORLD OF PREVIOUSLY UNREPORTED FACTS.