User talk:Lyndonbrons

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charley King (July 5)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AntientNestor was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charley King and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Charley_King Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AntientNestor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Charley_King reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AntientNestor (talk) 13:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey, thank you for your review. I'll do my best to address the issues presented before submitting again in the future. I relied heavily on the History of the 49th for where Charley was at any given time, but you are correct that the book only directly lists his enlistment and death. I extrapolated from there that he was at certain battles but that's not adequate citation, if I understand correctly? Would the article be better served if I simply remove anything extrapolated from that source and only included what could be verified in sources like the History of the 49th?
 * Also, I used the Villiage Record newspaper for some of this information, but the actual source is, as far as I know, only available on microfiche at the Chester County History Center. I will try to find at least a secondary source for that but is it appropriate to cite a microfiche roll that can't be easily accessed here? Or could I simply mention this is the original source but secondary sources referencing it exist?
 * Thanks for your help on this. 72.94.181.234 (talk) 13:31, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Hard-to-access sources are acceptable, see WP:SOURCEACCESS: just use it as though the reader could look it up if they needed to. Extrapolating from your source material is classed as original research, and not allowed. Good Luck! AntientNestor (talk) 15:09, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Someone else made an entry for Charley after reading something I had posted, so this version doesn't have to stay. But thank you for your help. 72.94.181.234 (talk) 14:12, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Charley King
Hello, Lyndonbrons. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charley King, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Charley King


Hello, Lyndonbrons. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Charley King".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 14:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)