User talk:Lynnettemclaughlin2

Welcome!
Hello Lynnettemclaughlin2 and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Ascentium, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write   below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 21:11, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

June 2013
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 21:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi there - im purely updating the information so its accurate and citing references to back up the modifications. The awards are not showing recent wins, information about the new company positioning as identified by Forrester analysts. I dont see this as promotional material but rather updating the information on the company.  Can we not review the changes together and the qualified citations so we can ensure the company listing is at least recent and address the comments regarding missing citations? Lynnettemclaughlin2 (talk) 21:24, 12 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Adding sourced information in a neutral tone is fine, and so is adding those sources (feel free to put them back in), but you're not "purely updating the information so it's accurate". You're rewriting the entire article in meaningless marketroid speak such as "a multi-disciplined staff and enterprise-class technology capabilities to deliver strategy and intelligence, experience design and technology for clients around the globe" and "deep capabilities in Internet marketing and technology". Please don't do that. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 23:58, 13 June 2013 (UTC)


 * After i made the edits following your feedback you still flag the article? Alright I give up - its not even worth trying to update with cited references and facts. Lynnettemclaughlin2 (talk) 17:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Please read Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 14:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)