User talk:Lynntchu

January 2017
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Neutralitytalk 01:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Notice
Neutralitytalk 01:43, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Monica Crowley, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Monica Crowley was changed by Lynntchu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916562 on 2017-01-19T02:26:02+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:26, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

I represent Monica Crowley. I wish to correct this page for its erroneous and defamatory assertion of the conclusion that she has committed plagiarism. The plagiarism accusation is an accusation only and alleged, only.

As for sources, I am the source. Citations to false "fake news" articles or online blogs—whether politico.com or truthrevolt.org—do not validate what I say. I validate my information. All of my proferred changes were polite and accurate and made in good faith.

For example, what possible issue do you have with including the full title of the book and the dissertation in question? These were wiped out.

What possible issue do you have with the fact that withdrawal of the book from sale is only "pending review" by its publisher, Broadside Books. Only a few of the items presented by CNN and replicated by Politico with respect to thave been found to have any merit on close review. A few instances where better attribution or paraphrase, in the context a long book or dissertation, is not "plagiarism" or cause for recission of a Ph.D. The effort here to imply that this is imminent and that Crowley is a plagiarist, is libellous and defamatory.

This assertion that I am committing some kind of "vandalism" by correcting these items is incorrect and ignores the defamatory implications in this article.Lynntchu (talk) 03:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)