User talk:Lynsbrow

Please move your non-profile information (topic related especially) onto your Talk page. Thanks! Ajungle (talk) 04:16, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Topic
I have chosen to expand on the Identity Management Theory since the Wikipedia page is not very expanded on. In addition, this theory can relate to my personal life and is something that we face day to day according to Cupach and Imahori. Also, this theory was established in the 1990's and is a newer topic in intercultural communication. Therefore, I would like to further expand on this area over the next couple months for a class project. I am compiling a couple sources to help me get started. Lynsbrow (talk) 03:58, 20 February 2013 (UTC) Lynsey

Rough Draft of Article Expansion
Identity Management Theory is a recent idea that was proposed in the 1990's. Cupach and Imahori based this theory on a book from the 1960's. The book, Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior, should be further expanded in order to understand the theory it was based on. Interestingly, Cupach and Imahori separate two types of communication; intercultural and intraculteral. Both these communication subgroups will be further researched in order to see the basis for this theory. Also, identities will be expanded on to fully grasp what Identity Management Theory is about. Erving Goffman is an author who helped the originators of IMT base their theory off of. Goffman was a well-known sociologist and writer. It makes sense that the IMT mentions his contribution, since he is the most cited sociologist from his writings because of what he studied in communication Goffman Wikipedia Site. Among the six essays that make up Goffman's book, the first essay shows an individual's self image while communicating. The author explained that the self-image that is obtained during interacting is not permanent and has a large social influence. The image someone gets in a social setting is than expected for the future. The risk of changing self-image in a social context will alter how the individual feels about oneself. The author was implying that often times the defense mechanism is to retract from showing your self to much in a social setting so others do not see them in a displeasing way. The idea of the Identity Management Theory uses the ideas by Goffman to help establish what the idea behind the theory is trying to get at. Intercultural verse intracultural communication varies significantly. Intercultural communication is based on a much greater scheme of things. This type of communication refers to a group of people that differ in backgrounds, whether that is religion, ethnic, education, or social backgrounds. Intercultural communication looks at how the world is viewed, how messages are interpreted,and how differing cultures react to situations [|Intercultural Communication]. On the contrary, intracultural communication discusses how people of the same background interact with one another. I thought it was interesting that there was not a Wikipedia page discussing this concept. It is very important to compare and contrast the opposite of intercultural communication to understand the similarities and differences. With little research done on intracultural communication, I am unable to correlate the two types of communication. The last concept to expand on is identity. Identity is directly connected with the Identity Management Theory since it helps define what this theory is trying to explain. Even though identity is a very broad topic, I will discuss personal identity through the lens of the individual, which will than effect its social identity. Identity is said to be the "distinct personality of an individual" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_%28social_science%29. It is interesting to hear that identity is both the identity one holds of themselves. Also, identity is the perception that someone holds in a social setting. Identity can be broken down even more by distinguishing specific characteristics within each individual and in different social setting. I am in awe that identity is not consistent and may be constantly changing. Each of the three concepts that were looked at will help expand on the Identity Management Theory. Each of these ideas directly correlate with the theory and will be useful in explaining this theory.

Actions done on the Topic Talk Page
This is all the information that I have posted on the actual Identity Management Theory talk page. I have had a great discussion with a couple of other individuals who are also exploring this topic further. It is so great to have help with additional sources from these individuals. This includes sources. In addition, I am able to use the other sources that people have suggested that I use on this idea.

This article does not have a good expansion about this theory. According to intercultural communication, this theory will greatly expand my knowledge on this subject matter. As this theory is of great interest to myself, however there is very vague information (stub) addressing this theory. In order to improve this article, there needs to be more expansion and exploration done. I will refer back to this article often and consider relating this to my future goals.

Lynsbrow (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2013 (UTC) I have found difficulty finding research on this theory but intend to use the research I have found to help me expand the subject. Lynsbrow (talk) 04:13, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Lynsey

http://books.google.com/books?id=E12VSljBmvAC&lpg=PA195&ots=FvUBOFBS3j&dq=identity%20management%20theory&lr&pg=PA195#v=onepage&q&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=E19wR7hEEoIC&lpg=PA64&ots=NSNPZgXJ4Q&dq=identity%20management%20theory&pg=PA64#v=onepage&q=identity%20management%20theory&f=false Thank you for the suggested resources for me to use. By the end of this article, I hope to help expand on what Identity Management Theory is. Also, I want to look into what identity is and show the direct correlation that this will play on the theory. Lynsbrow (talk) 05:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Wiki 6 and on...
I have posted the 3-4 paragraph article that I wrote onto the talk page. Also, I have already explained what I hope to add to the article talk page so I can help other people who ever look onto this theory.

Help us improve the Wikipedia Education Program
Hi Lynsbrow! As a student editor on Wikipedia, you have a lot of valuable experience about what it's like to edit as a part of a classroom assignment. In order to help other students like you enjoy editing while contributing positively to Wikipedia, it's extremely helpful to hear from real student editors about their challenges, successes, and support needs. Please take a few minutes to answer these questions by clicking below. (Note that the responses are posted to a public wiki page.) Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Sage Ross (WMF), 17:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Breakdown of Wiki 1-10
Wiki #1 Jan 18, 2013- Completed training for student orientation Wiki #2 Created an account, Jan 16, 2013- first made edits into a sandbox Feb 1, 2013- Created user page Signed up on the list of students, Spoke with a Wikipedian Subst.kitten, recently added what I wrote to the user talk page (April 20, 2013) Jan 16, 2013 Left a message for a classmate on user talk page and asked about training and said a friendly hello to Amy Hallstrom Wiki #3 Jan 30, 2013- Article talk page on how to improve the site for Identity Management Theory, included 2 sources and then received other suggestions for sources from other individuals "This article does not have a good expansion about this theory. According to intercultural communication, this theory will greatly expand my knowledge on this subject matter. As this theory is of great interest to myself, however there is very vague information (stub) addressing this theory. In order to improve this article, there needs to be more expansion and exploration done. I will refer back to this article often and consider relating this to my future goals. Lynsbrow (talk) 20:14, 30 January 2013 (UTC) [1] [2]" Wiki #4 Summary edit under: 1 sentence correlation between Goffman and IMT It is understandable that the Identity Mangement Theory mentions Goffman's contribution since he is the most cited sociologist from his writings because of what he studied in communication http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoffmanGoffman Wikipedia Site. Posted on IMT article page on April 20, 2013 Wiki #5 Identify Management Theory is on the class course page. All other pages are removed from my user page. IMT information is the only article mentioned on my talk page. Also, my bibliography will consist of the articles previously posted and the other sources people posted on the talk page of IMT. Since this is a newer theory, not many sources are discovered. The other suggested sources have been reviewed and sifted through to further my knowledge on this theory. Wiki #6 The following has been posted in the IMT talk page; Thank you for the suggested resources for me to use. By the end of this article, I hope to help expand on what Identity Management Theory is. Also, I want to look into what identity is and show the direct correlation that this will play on the theory. Lynsbrow (talk) 05:20, 3 April 2013 (UTC) The starter draft was in my sandbox. Identity Management Theory is a recent idea that was proposed in the 1990's. Cupach and Imahori based this theory on a book from the 1960's. The book, Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior, should be further expanded in order to understand the theory it was based on. Interestingly, Cupach and Imahori separate two types of communication; intercultural and intraculteral. Both these communication subgroups will be further researched in order to see the basis for this theory. Also, identities will be expanded on to fully grasp what Identity Management Theory is about. Erving Goffman is an author who helped the originators of IMT base their theory off of. Goffman was a well-known sociologist and writer. It makes sense that the IMT mentions his contribution, since he is the most cited sociologist from his writings because of what he studied in communication Goffman Wikipedia Site. Among the six essays that make up Goffman's book, the first essay shows an individual's self image while communicating. The author explained that the self-image that is obtained during interacting is not permanent and has a large social influence. The image someone gets in a social setting is than expected for the future. The risk of changing self-image in a social context will alter how the individual feels about oneself. The author was implying that often times the defense mechanism is to retract from showing your self to much in a social setting so others do not see them in a displeasing way. The idea of the Identity Management Theory uses the ideas by Goffman to help establish what the idea behind the theory is trying to get at. Intercultural verse intracultural communication varies significantly. Intercultural communication is based on a much greater scheme of things. This type of communication refers to a group of people that differ in backgrounds, whether that is religion, ethnic, education, or social backgrounds. Intercultural communication looks at how the world is viewed, how messages are interpreted,and how differing cultures react to situations [Communication ]. On the contrary, intracultural communication discusses how people of the same background interact with one another. I thought it was interesting that there was not a Wikipedia page discussing this concept. It is very important to compare and contrast the opposite of intercultural communication to understand the similarities and differences. With little research done on intracultural communication, I am unable to correlate the two types of communication. The last concept to expand on is identity. Identity is directly connected with the Identity Management Theory since it helps define what this theory is trying to explain. Even though identity is a very broad topic, I will discuss personal identity through the lens of the individual, which will than effect its social identity. Identity is said to be the "distinct personality of an individual" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_%28social_science%29. It is interesting to hear that identity is both the identity one holds of themselves. Also, identity is the perception that someone holds in a social setting. Identity can be broken down even more by distinguishing specific characteristics within each individual and in different social setting. I am in awe that identity is not consistent and may be constantly changing. Each of the three concepts that were looked at will help expand on the Identity Management Theory. Each of these ideas directly correlate with the theory and will be useful in explaining this theory. Lynsbrow (talk) 18:02, 3 March 2013 (UTC)Lynsey Wiki #7 The previous starter draft was edited and placed in the IMT talk page: dentity Management Theory is a recent idea that was proposed in the 1990's. Cupach and Imahori based this theory on a book from the 1960's. The book, Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior, should be further expanded in order to understand the theory it was based on. Interestingly, Cupach and Imahori separate two types of communication; intercultural and intraculteral. Both these communication subgroups will be further researched in order to see the basis for this theory. Also, identities will be expanded on to fully grasp what Identity Management Theory is about. Erving Goffman is an author who helped the originators of IMT base their theory off of. Goffman was a well-known sociologist and writer. It makes sense that the IMT mentions his contribution, since he is the most cited sociologist from his writings because of what he studied in communication Goffman Wikipedia Site. Among the six essays that make up Goffman's book, the first essay shows an individual's self image while communicating. The author explained that the self-image that is obtained during interacting is not permanent and has a large social influence. The image someone gets in a social setting is than expected for the future. The risk of changing self-image in a social context will alter how the individual feels about oneself. The author was implying that often times the defense mechanism is to retract from showing your self to much in a social setting so others do not see them in a displeasing way. The idea of the Identity Management Theory uses the ideas by Goffman to help establish what the idea behind the theory is trying to get at. Intercultural verse intracultural communication varies significantly. Intercultural communication is based on a much greater scheme of things. This type of communication refers to a group of people that differ in backgrounds, whether that is religion, ethnic, education, or social backgrounds. Intercultural communication looks at how the world is viewed, how messages are interpreted,and how differing cultures react to situations [Communication ]. On the contrary, intracultural communication discusses how people of the same background interact with one another. I thought it was interesting that there was not a Wikipedia page discussing this concept. It is very important to compare and contrast the opposite of intercultural communication to understand the similarities and differences. With little research done on intracultural communication, I am unable to correlate the two types of communication. The last concept to expand on is identity. Identity is directly connected with the Identity Management Theory since it helps define what this theory is trying to explain. Even though identity is a very broad topic, I will discuss personal identity through the lens of the individual, which will than effect its social identity. Identity is said to be the "distinct personality of an individual" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_%28social_science%29. It is interesting to hear that identity is both the identity one holds of themselves. Also, identity is the perception that someone holds in a social setting. Identity can be broken down even more by distinguishing specific characteristics within each individual and in different social setting. I am in awe that identity is not consistent and may be constantly changing. Each of the three concepts that were looked at will help expand on the Identity Management Theory. Each of these ideas directly correlate with the theory and will be useful in explaining this theory. For an Intercultural Communication class, I am looking into this topic. This is a starting article that gives the premise of what is already known of what is known about this theory. Also, I will use the sources I found. In addition, I will use the other recommended sources to make my edits for the next draft of the article to add to the main page. Lynsbrow (talk) 19:34, 3 April 2013 (UTC) Wiki #8 The draft has been continually edited to make it be a comprehensive and well-written expansion of IMT. I will peer review Haleyhook on her article critique for cultural conflict. The second peer review will be Sweatshops by Laurenleaf. Wiki #9 I have peer reviewed both Haleyhook and Laurenleaf articles. These were discussed and posted in the article talk pages of the article talk pages. However, Haleyhook only mentioned some bullet points on what she intends to accomplish and than her hopes for at the end of the final draft. I posted suggestions on the article talk page for her. Laurenleaf did a good job starting off her starter draft. i posted very few suggestions since I feel she did a good job. Laurenleaf I feel you did a good job explaining the basics of sweatshops. I feel you did a good job on your starter draft. Some minor suggestions include maybe getting a statistic of the suicide rates in the Chinese Sweatshops. This may add intensity to the article and make it known to the readers the severity of the issue. Also, I think you are going in a good direction in regards to closing the gap between the laborers and how the sweatshops are still running. It would be a great connect to see how large of an impact that laborers play in part of the equation for sweatshops. Lynsbrow (talk) 23:17, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Lynsbrow

Organizing the article's page will make it easy for viewers to see what the main points of this conflict are. Also, I like your approach on breaking down the issue entirely. Not only do conflicts exist between cultures and within cultures, but you brought up a valid point on how to respond to the issue. The bullet points that you broke down regarding areas that will need to be taken into perspective are very key points that will really address greater causes of conflict. I think you have a great foundation to start writing your final draft to add to the article's page. Great job and can not wait to see the final project. Lynsbrow (talk) 23:06, 20 April 2013 (UTC)Lynsbrow

Wiki #10 I have had most my interaction between other individuals who are working on expanding the IMT wikipedia page. We have interacted and helped others with more sources to base our research on. Also, another individual mentioned that one article I used was not necessarily relevant to the topic. Therefore, I edited my draft and did not use that source. For now, this is all the interaction I have had with people on my article edit but will add any further commentary if I speak with classmates prior to the semester concluding.

Wiki assignments that needed improvement- 2, 4, 6, 10
Wiki #2- I am currently talking to you on my talk page. I have placed all of my information and have been receiving your feedback.

Wiki #4- Here is a list of my compiled sources. I have used both the sources that I have found. In addition, I have used the sources that the other wikipedians suggested to me.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GoffmanGoffman http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_%28social_science%29. http://books.google.com/books?id=E12VSljBmvAC&lpg=PA195&ots=FvUBOFBS3j&dq=identity%20management%20theory&lr&pg=PA195#v=onepage&q&f=false http://books.google.com/books?id=E19wR7hEEoIC&lpg=PA64&ots=NSNPZgXJ4Q&dq=identity%20management%20theory&pg=PA64#v=onepage&q=identity%20management%20theory&f=false Lustig M, Koester J. Intercultural Competence; Interpersonal Communication across Cultures. 6th Addition. Boston, 2010. Ravasi, D., & Johan, v. R. (2003). Key issues in organizational identity and identification theory. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(2), 118-132. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/231497985?accountid=8459 Bartholm, R. H., & T.C. Melewar. (2011). Exploring the auditory dimension of corporate identity management. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 29(2), 92-107. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02634501111117566 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lynsbrow (talk • contribs) 20:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Colin Tredoux, et al. "Social Identity Theory And The Authoritarian Personality Theory In South Africa." South African Journal Of Psychology 33.2 (2003): 109-117. Niens, Ulrike, and Ed Cairns. "Identity Management Strategies In Northern Ireland." Journal Of Social Psychology 142.3 (2002): 371-380. Shepperd, James A., Alexander J. Rothman, and William M. P. Klein. "Self-Regulation, Identity-Regulation And Health." Self & Identity 10.3 (2011): 281-283. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DaChavey09 (talk • contribs) 04:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Wiki #6- I need to make my purpose for this article much more specific. Since the article is not very established, I need to find more specific details about the article. I now propose to make the following changes. I first want to explain what the relevance is behind this topic. Identity is a very general term and this theory has many subtopics to it that may be of interest to others. For my personal reasons, I want to really analyze why this theory was even created. It seems to be a very general theory that does not have factual knowledge to support its arguments. I will need to look at the historical context in order to find the relevance of IMT. These changes are a bit more specific and attainable.

Wiki #10 My original article was this: Identity Management Theory is a recent idea that was proposed in the 1990's. Cupach and Imahori based this theory on a book from the 1960's. The book, Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior, should be further expanded in order to understand the theory it was based on. Interestingly, Cupach and Imahori separate two types of communication; intercultural and intraculteral. Both these communication subgroups will be further researched in order to see the basis for this theory. Also, identities will be expanded on to fully grasp what Identity Management Theory is about.

Erving Goffman is an author who helped the originators of IMT base their theory off of. Goffman was a well-known sociologist and writer. It makes sense that the IMT mentions his contribution, since he is the most cited sociologist from his writings because of what he studied in communication Goffman Wikipedia Site. Among the six essays that make up Goffman's book, the first essay shows an individual's self image while communicating. The author explained that the self-image that is obtained during interacting is not permanent and has a large social influence. The image someone gets in a social setting is than expected for the future. The risk of changing self-image in a social context will alter how the individual feels about oneself. The author was implying that often times the defense mechanism is to retract from showing your self to much in a social setting so others do not see them in a displeasing way. The idea of the Identity Management Theory uses the ideas by Goffman to help establish what the idea behind the theory is trying to get at.

Intercultural verse intracultural communication varies significantly. Intercultural communication is based on a much greater scheme of things. This type of communication refers to a group of people that differ in backgrounds, whether that is religion, ethnic, education, or social backgrounds. Intercultural communication looks at how the world is viewed, how messages are interpreted,and how differing cultures react to situations [Communication ]. On the contrary, intracultural communication discusses how people of the same background interact with one another. I thought it was interesting that there was not a Wikipedia page discussing this concept. It is very important to compare and contrast the opposite of intercultural communication to understand the similarities and differences. With little research done on intracultural communication, I am unable to correlate the two types of communication.

The last concept to expand on is identity. Identity is directly connected with the Identity Management Theory since it helps define what this theory is trying to explain. Even though identity is a very broad topic, I will discuss personal identity through the lens of the individual, which will than effect its social identity. Identity is said to be the "distinct personality of an individual" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_%28social_science%29. It is interesting to hear that identity is both the identity one holds of themselves. Also, identity is the perception that someone holds in a social setting. Identity can be broken down even more by distinguishing specific characteristics within each individual and in different social setting. I am in awe that identity is not consistent and may be constantly changing. Each of the three concepts that were looked at will help expand on the Identity Management Theory. Each of these ideas directly correlates with the theory. I have made suggested changes from my professor. Also, I took a few comments from the wikipedians that helped me use more credible sources. My final draft that I will post on the IMT page is:

Erving Goffman is an author who helped the originators of IMT base their theory off of. Goffman was a well-known sociologist and writer. It makes sense that the IMT mentions his contribution, since he is the most cited sociologist from his writings because of what he studied in communication Goffman Wikipedia Site. Among the six essays that make up Goffman's book, the first essay shows an individual's self image while engaging in communicating with another individual. The author explained that the self-image that is obtained during interacting is not permanent and has a large social influence. The image someone gets in a social setting is than expected for the future. The risk of changing self-image in a social context will alter how the individual feels about oneself. The author was implying that often times the defense mechanism is to retract from showing your self to much in a social setting so others do not see them in a displeasing way. The idea of the Identity Management Theory uses the ideas of Goffman to help establish what the idea behind the theory is trying to get at. Intercultural verse intracultural communication varies significantly. Intercultural communication is based on a much greater scheme of things. This type of communication refers to a group of people that differ in backgrounds, whether that is religion, ethnic, education, or social backgrounds. Intercultural communication looks at how the world is viewed, how messages are interpreted, and how differing cultures react to situations [Communication ]. On the contrary, intracultural communication discusses how people of the same background interact with one another. I thought it was interesting that there was not a Wikipedia page discussing this concept. It is very important to compare and contrast intercultural communication to understand the similarities and differences. With little research conducted on intracultural communication, I am unable to correlate the two types of communication.

The last concept to expand on is identity. Identity is directly connected with the Identity Management Theory since it helps define what this theory is trying to explain. Even though identity is a very broad topic, I will discuss personal identity through the lens of the individual, which will than effect its social identity. Identity is said to be the "distinct personality of an individual" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_%28social_science%29. Identity can be the view that people hold about themselves. Also, identity is the perception that people hold about themselves in a social setting. Identity has many subtopics that distinguish why this theory is specific and different than other identity theories. Specific characteristics explain how people feel about themselves as an individual and in a social setting.

Peer Review, by Rodmer Lomboy
Hi, I really enjoyed reading your work on Identity Management Theory. This topic has already been interesting to me, and your work has furthered my curiosity in this area of identity theories. Your work has been excellently documented and there is a logical flow to what you are trying to expand on. Great work. Rodmer Lomboy (talk) 22:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Subst.kitten


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Subst.kitten, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. – Train2104 (t • c) 13:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)