User talk:Lyonspotter

Lyon-Saint Exupéry Airport
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lyon-Saint Exupéry Airport, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: Saint-Exupéry International Airport. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

The redirect
Hi, I reverted your airport redirect. Moving it in that way loses all the page's history. If you think the page should be moved, you may want to discuss it on the article's talk page and with the associated Wikiprojects first. Good luck, FCSundae ∨  ☃   (talk) 22:56, 24 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I've asked for help at the administrators' noteboard here. Feel free to comment there on the move. Thanks! FCSundae  ∨  ☃   (talk) 23:05, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

The Red House Report
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Red House Report, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.watchmanbiblestudy.com/Topics/Europe/The%20secret%20report%20that%20shows%20how%20the%20Nazis%20planned%20a%20Fourth%20Reich%20...in%20the%20EU.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: The Red House Report
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as The Red House Report, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.watchmanbiblestudy.com/Topics/Europe/The%20secret%20report%20that%20shows%20how%20the%20Nazis%20planned%20a%20Fourth%20Reich%20...in%20the%20EU.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Red House Report and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, The Red House Report, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:The Red House Report with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Red House Report. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:The Red House Report saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 17:33, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Feltham and Heston
The news of his death is not the issue. The date of the by-election IS - can you provide evidence for the by-election taking place in 2011 please? doktorb wordsdeeds 16:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carlos Cortiglia


The article Carlos Cortiglia has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  00:52, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Michael Shrimpton.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Michael Shrimpton.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. -- The Red Pen of Doom  11:50, 10 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note that just being on the web does not make the image public domain and that uploads to Wikipedia ALWAYS require verification of free use directly from the copyright holder, not merely claims that verification "will be supplied upon request".