User talk:Lyoshka

Welcome
 Hi Lyoshka, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of Contents


 * Department directory

Need help?


 * Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
 * Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.


 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
 * The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.


 * Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[Image:Button sig2.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.


 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
 * If you'd like to tell us about yourself and meet other new users, be sure to introduce yourself at our new user log.

 Good luck, and have fun.

Congressional staff salary information
"the process may take longer than several days"


 * No problem, as long as it is done in a reasonable time frame and without any bias. By the way, I noticed that the same link was posted on the page of a Congressional staffer (Jessica Cutler‎, not a member of Congress. I reverted it because I doubt that anyone will add it to every staffer's page, but if I misjudged please give me a rationale and I may revert my edit. Ward3001 (talk) 01:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Please use edit summaries
I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Thanks! Qqqqqq (talk) 01:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

FYI
I noticed you are putting many, many links to that website into Wikipedia articles. I've asked administrators to review this, here:

Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents

Thanks. Lawrence Cohen 17:29, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Additions of 505 links to legistorm.com

 * Accounts

→Storming Media LLC STORMING-MEDIA-LLC This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent insertion of spam, commercial content, and/or links is prohibited under policy. Any further spamming may result in your account and/or your IP address being blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hu12 (talk) 23:17, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Blocked IP
I have added links to several senators who recently had their financial information brought into public's eye. After that I have been contacted by an editor who advised me that the I cannot add links only to a few congressmen, because the action is seen as biased. So I went ahead and added the links to all members of congress. The site has been reviewed by an administrator who did not see anything wrong with it. The site is a free site serving only to bring more transparency. So how is it that after all of these steps, I end up being blocked as a spammer? I did not add any irrelevant links to any of the congressmen pages.

I request to have my IP unblocked since I was following the guidelines provided by the WP editors. If, however, the consensus is that the links are inappropriate then they can be removed.

Here's the block information: * IP address: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:74.93.192.118 * Blocking admin: Ryulong * Block reason: Spamming links to external sites * Block originally applied to: Lyoshka --Lyoshka (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


 * This user requested on unblock-en-l that he be unblocked. I have raised the matter on WP:ANI.  I believe it important to note that I am not disagreeing with your block, only stating that I am strongly leaning toward unblocking the user.  Anyway, please direct your comments to WP:ANI.  Thanks!  --Yamla (talk) 21:47, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

Unblocked
As per our discussion on unblock-en-l and after consulting with other admins on WP:ANI, I have lifted your block. Welcome back! --Yamla (talk) 03:48, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Great, thanks to you and all other admins for understanding. --Lyoshka (talk) 16:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)