User talk:Lystergic

Speedy deletion nomination of Dynamic and Proactive Nautical Route Planning


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dynamic and Proactive Nautical Route Planning requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the page be "userfied" or emailed to you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Image portraying the basic concept of operations integration within STM.png
Thanks for uploading File:Image portraying the basic concept of operations integration within STM.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text   below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:23, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Identifying the Scope of Sea Traffic Management- The Interface to Ports Operations.pdf listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Identifying the Scope of Sea Traffic Management- The Interface to Ports Operations.pdf, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Echocrats
Hello, Lystergic,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Nick Moyes and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Echocrats for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion] but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Nick Moyes (talk) 19:46, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Echocracy moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Echocracy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nick Moyes (talk) 20:02, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Welcome back
Welcome back to Wikipedia. Looks like you've had quite a break. I'm afraid you got off to a bit of a shaky start after creating two blank articles. You'll see that I've deleted the first blank one which wasn't touched for 15 minutes, and have moved the second one to draft. You can develop it there. I hope you appreciate that any article in mainspace has to have a semblance of being encyclopaedic - and yours was nothing near. In future, could you use either your personal sandbox or start a draft at Articles for Creation, please? You might like to refresh yourself by reading Your first article, as well as WP:NEO which explains that we do not allow neologisms to be promoted via Wikipedia, and that all new articles have to meet our Notability criteria. Any problems, drop by at the Teahouse and ask for assistance. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Echocracy


Hello, Lystergic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Echocracy.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 02:44, 14 August 2019 (UTC)