User talk:Lzs0219

assessment
The basic structure of this article is pretty good, it's very clear to see the main opinions and support opinions of behavioral economics. It's useful for all readers since it can provide enough evidence and with no obvious problems. But it can be assessed to be a very successful article since the quality is not professional enough. The subject is important but the sentence is not economical enough. It has some theoretical mistakes
 * calss=GA
 * importance=high

October 2020
Hello! I wanted to let you know that one of your recent contributions has been undone because it added the Good Article template to Consumer behavior, an article that has not been promoted by the Good Article Nomination process. If you believe that this article meets the Good Article Criteria, then you are encouraged to nominate it for review by following the Good Article nominating instructions. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Good Article Nominations talk page. Thank you. -Bryan Rutherford (talk) 12:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)