User talk:Mário, Košice

Welcome!
Hello, Mário, Košice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Mário, Košice did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Adakiko (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Note: Addition of "pop" needs to cite a source. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 19:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Adakiko Thank you for truth removal, and please explain where is the cite source for being only duo? Mário, Košice (talk) 19:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * There appears to not be a source. You added "pop"; I presume you meant pop music. Please cite a source for them being a popular music band. To add a citation, please see wp:citing sources. Thank you Adakiko (talk) Adakiko (talk) 20:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Adakiko Did you meant, that every single added word has to be cited? Mário, Košice (talk) 20:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok, I forget to added a word before. Going to add now, so see if is correct. Mário, Košice (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * You need to cite a source for them being a popular music band. Nothing in that article supports them being a pop music band. Adakiko (talk) 20:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Your edit to Cheri, Cheri Lady has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Looks like a copyvio from https://oldtimemusic.com/the-meaning-behind-the-song-cheri-cheri-lady-by-modern-talking/ Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 00:29, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop re-adding copyright infringement to articles. Your addition of content to Cheri, Cheri Lady in this edit is an exact copy from oldtimemusic.com, which is copyrighted work. You will be blocked from editing if you continue to add copyright violations to articles. Thank you. Thriftycat Talk • Contribs 20:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Thriftycat Thanks for let me know, didn't know that. Mário, Košice (talk) 09:06, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Cheri, Cheri Lady, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Adakiko Thank you for your prompt response. Where do you have a problem, since I added fact in my own words? Do you think a particular site is better without new knowledge? Mário, Košice (talk) 14:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cheri, Cheri Lady. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MacAddct1984 (talk &#124; contribs) 14:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Macaddct1984 Hello there, what leads you to tell such of unprofessional comments? The comments are base on facts, if you do not like it, then do not read it. Many thanks. Mário, Košice (talk) 14:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Significant content needs to be verifiable. See Wikipedia's policy on the matter: wp:verifiability. You need to cite a wp:reliable source. See wp:citing sources. Use of one's own knowledge or analysis is not verifiable and should not be used. See wp:original research. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 19:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Cheri, Cheri Lady, you may be blocked from editing. If you don't understand how to cite a source (see above), please stop editing. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 20:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Adakiko If you are not happy, tell me where is a source in first clause? I do not see any there. Mário, Košice (talk) 20:14, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * You added "pop music". How would I and others verify that they are a "pop music band"? Adakiko (talk) 20:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Adakiko In other words, who is making songs if not pop music bands? Is anything all right with you, or do you need any help as you missing very simple understanding of common contents? Mário, Košice (talk) 20:37, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Adakiko Explain why you deleted very simple fact wrote? It might be a complain for that. Mário, Košice (talk) 20:16, 22 November 2023 (UTC)


 * It was unsourced. Wikipedia content requires that content be wp:verifiable. Don't add content without citing a wp:reliable source. If you have questions on how to do so, please ask at the wp:Teahouse for fast, expert response. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 20:19, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Adakiko Thing you don't understand. Again, let me see, where is the source in a first clause? Mário, Košice (talk) 20:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Adakiko Respond if every single word added needs a source? Mário, Košice (talk) 20:25, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I just added a fact to the first clause and is not a source or site there, or do you see any? So, could you put back what I wrote? Like "Pop music" where it belongs as it was missing. Mário, Košice (talk) 20:20, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * No. That content did not cite a source. What is your native language? Perhaps one of these might help: In Polish: Bibliografia. In German: Zitierregeln. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 20:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Adakiko I can't see the cite source in first clause. Show me the cite source there or add missing words, which you removed. Mário, Košice (talk) 20:31, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * As "pop" is used and cited in Modern Talking, I restored it. You could have copied the citation from that article: https://www.dw.com/en/dieter-bohlen-germanys-prince-of-pop/a-776871 and added This creates a citation here-> which shows up below in the references section. Please add comments before the wp:template reflist talk Thank you Adakiko (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Adakiko Thank you, could you restored word "music" as well? As they are significantly music pop duo. Mário, Košice (talk) 20:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Adakiko You cannot prove, where is the first site clause. You cannot tell if any single word needs to be cite sourced and you cannot explain why you removing the facts. And instead you wish to stop me editing for adding simple fact of true? No, you should put it back this word as they are a popular music band. Or Google it somewhere, if you are not happy. Mário, Košice (talk) 20:45, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't follow your first sentence. Policy on the second sentence is wp:verifiability. e.g. don't add such an adjective without a source. Could be a "heavy metal band", a "classical piano band", etc. How would anyone check this? Asking one to Google for that information does not meet the verifiability policy. BTW: I put "pop" back as it's supported on Modern Talking. Adakiko (talk) 20:52, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

Adakiko For example, if someone would like to add anything in his own words, for example story behind the song or any additional facts it simply can't? You know that own words can be sourced. Mário, Košice (talk) 21:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * One's own words are not verifiable. How does one check them for being correct? Have their brain removed and wired into Wikipedia's servers? One's own words are wp:original research or synthesis. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Mistake, not "are" but they "were". Mário, Košice (talk) 21:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Adakiko All right, that means no one is studying that, now is just proving by cite sourcing. Thanks. Mário, Košice (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I hope I helped here. Sorry for all the confusion. I recommend asking at the wp:Teahouse. I probably won't be available for awhile. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 21:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)