User talk:M-134

Cooey 84
Just some things I saw when clicking on RecentChanges:
 * wich  s.b.  which
 * shogun s.b. shotgun
 * coburg,ontario needs capitals like a couple lines down
 * reciever s.b.  receiver
 * aproxamently s.b. approximately
 * powerfull s.b. powerful
 * "barrel wa full choke" s.b. "barrel was full choke"

There's more than one of the first one, so you might check for repeats. One of the reasons I like Firefox browser is because I can enable a spell-checker in the browser. Just makes it easier. Maybe you can find a spell-checker for your browser? 24.28.17.231 (talk) 04:10, 28 April 2012 (UTC) (a weird guy)

Talking in an article
Regarding this edit, please do not add commentary to articles such as "to whom it may concern - all info in this article is correct". Articles should contain only article content. If you need to comment on the content, that's what the article talk page is for. In this case, your assertion that "all info is correct" is a bit specious, given that the only reference you have provided is to some collector's defunct page. (Please refer to Wikipedia's guidelines on reliable sources.) WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 19:42, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Phil Harris (fisherman). While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 01:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Serious concenrs
Hi M-134, I just reverted you again at Great Lake Warriors, because the information you added was unsourced. And, looking at your talk page here, I see that quite a number of other editors have brought the matter to your attention on other articles. I'm concerned that you may simply not be understanding how Wikipedia works. You can't just add information to articles that you believe is true. Wikipedia requires that information be verified by reliable sources. Could you please read through those two links to see if you can understand our rules? If you keep adding unsourced information, I may have to block you to prevent disruption to the encyclopedia. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:16, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Djembayz (talk) 03:49, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating M/V Miseford, M-134!

Wikipedia editor Djembayz just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Ahoy there! Thanks for starting this tugboat article out on an even keel with two photos, an infobox, and citations. Whoo-hoo!"

To reply, leave a comment on Djembayz's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Detroit diesel 6051 quad-71, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 18:01, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Medal
Sorry, I was a bit testy at the time. -- Ħ   MIESIANIACAL  20:10, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tug Brompton Caribou, a old logging tug from a time-gone-by. photo belongs to Mr. Robert B. Farrow.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tug Brompton Caribou, a old logging tug from a time-gone-by. photo belongs to Mr. Robert B. Farrow.jpg, which you've attributed to Robert B. Farrow. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:18, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

I talked to rob about it, he said he will be sending a email confirming that he approved it.