User talk:M-Willhelm-Schmid

July 2024
Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 12:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)


 * I use it and found it by googling. Is that not notable when it shows up on google? M-Willhelm-Schmid (talk) 12:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * No, 'shows up on google' is not the standard here. We have had problems in the past with individuals (apparently employees) spamming links to RealTimeLogic's products. Kindly stop. MrOllie (talk) 12:43, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * but I find several references including this article googling I found an article here https://www.cnx-software.com/2020/02/21/barracuda-app-server-for-esp32-let-you-easily-develop-lua-apps-via-your-web-browser/
 * I use it for my ESP32 microcontroller project M-Willhelm-Schmid (talk) 12:48, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * BTW, by googling I found an article here https://www.cnx-software.com/2020/02/21/barracuda-app-server-for-esp32-let-you-easily-develop-lua-apps-via-your-web-browser/ M-Willhelm-Schmid (talk) 12:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Random blog posts don't help either. The standards have been linked above, kindly read them. MrOllie (talk) 12:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * well, if that's the case, then few of the others should be on that page???? M-Willhelm-Schmid (talk) 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is a large site and volunteer time is limited, all sorts of cleanup are ongoing projects. I saw there were a couple of entries that hadn't been cleaned up after the corresponding Wikipedia articles went through the deletion process, it is handled now. Everything else seems to meet requirements. MrOllie (talk) 13:01, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * ok, I put some time into googling and I find lots of references. Here are a few in English
 * https://www.linuxjournal.com/node/1132927
 * https://github.com/renatoathaydes/mako-smarthome
 * https://renato.athaydes.com/posts/writing-your-own-smarthome-manager.html
 * https://hackaday.com/2023/06/06/a-lightweight-smart-home-server/
 * https://www.beagleboard.org/projects/makoserver-net
 * https://www.thefreelibrary.com/MAKO+SERVER+OFFERS+WEB+APP+FOR+LINUX+PLATFORMS.-a0336359101
 * https://linuxgizmos.com/tutorial-shows-how-to-create-a-cheap-diy-iot-cloud-platform/ M-Willhelm-Schmid (talk) 13:22, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * More stuff that doesn't meet our sourcing requirements. Just because you found it on Google, that doesn't mean that we can use it for anything. MrOllie (talk) 13:23, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Well I read the "sourcing requirements" and now I feel you are being biased. M-Willhelm-Schmid (talk) 14:21, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You're welcome to feel however you like, but that won't change the requirements or the inclusion requirements for the lists you have been attempting to change. Since you're now making personal attacks, I'm done here. If you have any further questions you may bring them to WP:TEAHOUSE. MrOllie (talk) 14:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, it was not my intention to do any personal attacks. I am sorry you feel that way. M-Willhelm-Schmid (talk) 14:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello M-Willhelm-Schmid. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:M-Willhelm-Schmid. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 12:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)